headerphoto

Official PayPal Seal

Visitor's Today

1499

Do Animal Control Authorities (Dog Catchers) have to be Nincompoops?

Do Animal Control Authorities (Dog Catchers) have to be Nincompoops?

 

Do Animal Control Authorities (dog catchers) have to be nincompoops?

Do Animal Control Services (sometimes misnamed as a "Humane Society)" enforce animal control duties thru tyranny without “due process” or justice or even a nuisance complaint?

6 March 10

By Dean A. Ayers

Lead Investigative Reporter

NationalDogPress ©

 

Do Animal Control Authorities (dog catchers) have to be “nincompoops” to work for Animal Control Services(sometimes misnamed as a "Humane Society)" in their communities, or does just being a “nincompoop” in enforcing animal control duties just help tyranny without “due process” or  justice prevail in animal care, control, and license laws?

 

Some “Nincompoop” Animal Control examples:


  • In March 2009, Animal Control in Providence, Utah allegedly was going door to door to check on dog licenses. Yeah, let's spend our time going after people whose dogs haven't actually caused a problem. Mayor Randy Simmons put a stop to it.

 

  • A few months ago, Animal Control in South Salt Lake, Utah allegedly left a skunk trap out in the hot sun for an entire weekend, then tried to prosecute the guy who moved the trap out of the sun.

 

  • Last year, Sandy Animal Control allegedly picked up a 17 year old deaf cat on a sidewalk near its house and, unable to tell the difference between an old deaf cat and a sick cat, immediately killed it.

 

  • A couple of years ago, Animal Control in Tooele, Utah allegedly was doing even worse: They were going door to door and ordering people to get rid of any pets over their “technical number” limit, regardless of whether there had been any problem or any neighbors had complained. The city council put a stop to it.

 

  • Recently, West Jordan, Utah Animal Control allegedly cited a woman whose dog got out while she was visiting her mother. That was fine, but they also cited her for not having her dog licensed in West Jordan,Utah. It wasn't good enough that it was already and legally licensed in Sandy, Utah where she lives.

 

  • A while back, another Animal Control department in Salt Lake County, Utah allegedly cited a woman for having her gate open under animal control laws, even though her dog was still inside the yard.

 

  • Last year, West Valley, Utah allegedly was planning to use an inhumane gas chamber to euthanize pets. Still no word on the outcome of this alleged “Nazi-like” animal death camp procedure.


These are just recent examples of “tyranny” in animal control enforcement in one state alone, when in fact there are many other various and numerous cases of pet owner ‘civil rights” abuse by animal control “rogue” power and authority that can be found in all 50 states of this family animal filled nation. Many other “true” horror tales of tyranny animal law experiences with Animal Control Authorities are found in virtually every community; these being just a few examples of “nincompoops”, to verify what pet owners all across the nation have been publicly reporting as an “abuse of power” – “tyranny enforcement” by animal control authorities against pet owners who’s pets and animals are not a nuisance, nor being complained about (by anyone), or causing any problem in their locale with their pets and animals. What “We the People” can't figure out is whether Animal Control workers are told to be jerky, or does it just come naturally being an Animal Control “nincompoop” when they exercise “tyranny” enforcement by going door to door, or going to rural private property to rural private property intimidating, threatening, and coercing dog, cat, pet, or animal owners. Demanding unpaid “TAXES” on licenses for pets to be paid (on the spot) or face immediate confiscation of their pets to be enforced, and also the demanding to know if owners are over arbitrary set pet “number limits”, etc?

 

The ultimate perversion of “petty” animal complaint’s truth at its deepest core in society.

Many of our fellow citizens, no longer have the tolerant souls and morals of free men and women towards animal ownership. They have the souls and morals of a now "perverted" mentality of busy-bodies and petty "tyrants" who want to ruin their neighbors' lives, kill their dogs, cats, or other pets and end their neighbor’s pet ownership rights. All in the name of an animal's right not to be owned by its master, but rather only be parented or controlled only by a 'parent-guardian' designation, which can be revoked by the “state” at any time with the “stroke” of a pen, called an animal law.

This is the ultimate perversion of truth at it's deepest core in society, by not cherishing family values with pet ownership “intrinsic value” in private property freedom, as well as, having pets being accepted as a lawful and protected member of the 'extended family' with the human beings in that family. In simple terms, the acceptance of socialism in the dogma of a dog hating, animal destroying neighborhood and society has taken root in America. Maybe even next door to your dog, cat, or other pet animal.

Our dogs, cats, pets and animals are, in fact, an integral part of our loving family units, having purpose, attention, affection, interaction, respect, family interaction and happiness for both humans and the pet animals on an “intrinsic value’ level, not that of meager chattel. However, the "animal rights activists" and legislative body members (local city, state and federal), who follow the animal rights activist's agenda to intentionally pervert the idea of a loving family with pet ownership interactions, has gone astray, from a logical and common sense way of thinking. These animal activist legal proposals are being implemented with intent of "malice” to the pet owners, as well as the pet animals themselves.

These animal rights intolerant people have become "tyrants" thru the use of our various legal systems and its “manipulated” proposal of animal care, animal license taxation, and controlling laws, destroying the very freedoms "We as People” seek and have a right to possess in a free society. This is a ‘realistic’ and ‘common sense’ brief documentary of the multitude of insanely ‘perverted’ proposal of violations of "pet ownership" rights and freedoms by none other than “nincompoops” wearing a badge or shoulder patch representing an animal control authority, implying they are a “Humane Society.”

 

The animal control and “taxation” laws by necessity of the written laws are not the highest obligation for the pet owner.

There are people so addicted to exaggeration they can't tell the truth without lying. ~Josh Billings

A strict observance of the written laws is doubtless one of the high duties of a good citizen, but it is not the highest. The laws of necessity, of self- preservation, of saving our country and our people, to include our extended family of dog, pets, and animals when in danger, are of higher obligation. Pets and animals morally, legally, and rightfully belong to you, the pet owner, not the government. Any “tyrant” can write a law taxing and controlling virtually anything or any animal, but this does not make the law constitutional or valid in the spirit or execution of law enforcement. Animal laws need to be legally “challenged” at every turn of the animal control screw by the “nincompoops” who extend enforcement to people not creating or causing any animal nuisance or problem on private property. Their alleged “nincompoop” sole goal is to create more “taxes” for their locale thru fees, fines, confiscations, seizures, or threats of criminal citations, fines, fees, or euthanasia of their animals if the pet owner does not comply. In a majority of animal care and control laws, there is “NO” legitimate and “NO” constitutional “due process” written in the animal law to enforce any lawful confiscation, seizure, or euthanasia of the pet owner’s animals. In a majority of cases the counties, or municipalities, essentially just “plagiarize” the writing of their own animal care and control laws from a neighboring county or municipality, never even considering or caring whether lawful “due process” is included in the newly “copied” law for their locale.

To lose our beloved pet animals, our family units and structure, and ultimately our freedom in this country by a unscrupulous adherence to written "anti-pet" ordinances and laws would be to lose the spirit of the lawful intent in law itself, with life, liberty, property, and all those who are enjoying them with us being dissolved as we speak in every state of the union. This is absolute absurdity sacrificing the end to the means in “tyranny” of animal care, animal license taxation, and control law enforcement.

 

Many dog owners in recent years have faced the unthinkable.

A knock at their door that has heralded the arrival of an Animal Control officer with a complaint about your dog(s). In some cases that visit has been concluded satisfactorily to both the dog owner and the animal control officer; in others it has meant the heartache of either seizure of the owner’s dog(s) or facing stiff fines for various reasons in citation.

With animal ownership laws undergoing evolving changes throughout the country, these ‘perverted’ evolving animal control laws are being actively used by 'animal rights extremists' some of which are in fact, animal control officers, and others in animal rights groups to enforce animal law tyranny as a means of dog owner 'harassment.' The possibility of a visit at your door on private property from Animal Control becomes ever more of a specter to haunt every dog owner.

Laws that ‘limit the number’ of dogs, cats. pets, and animals and also demand “license fees” for pets that never leave the home on their private property in a household are intended to make it easier to prosecute individuals who are thought to have "too many," or “not enough animal tax paid” according to an arbitrary standard, but is also applied even to those people who are not in violation of health, nuisance and humane laws. Pets and animals belong to YOU, not the government. The “number limit” laws and animal “tax” licensing laws are as different as ‘night is to day’ in all the various jurisdictions. None of these dog ‘limit laws’ or “animal tax license laws” are fair, balanced or lawful under the constitution with a proper established ‘due process' to defend themselves and their animals “PRIOR” to confiscation or euthanasia of the animals belonging to the dog or pet owner documented in the ordinance itself.

 

ALWAYS, Always, always:

Remember that it is paramount that all pet owners educate themselves and learn their animal care and control laws in their area and have a plan, decision, and potential legal counsel known, documented (phone number) and at hand, in order for the pet owner to know how far they are willing and able to 'stand your ground' in knowing your 'rights' in responsible dog, pet and animal ownership if and when a “nincompoop” animal control authority comes knocking on your door, demanding to “steal” your dog, cat, pet, or animal from you, when you have “not’ been a nuisance on your own private property.

Remember when it comes to freely owning your dogs, cats, pets and animals in an area frequented by Animal Rights “Activists” or Animal Control Authorities, or “Nincompoops”, "The truth is rarely pure and never simple."

###

Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit)

 "The truth is rarely pure and never simple."


 
Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

 
Legal Disclaimer: The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.
 

Copyright © 2006-2010,  Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) Iowa 2009, NationalDogPress News, All Rights Reserved


NationalDogPress © Articles "Scroll Down" Below This Cover Page.


 
 

NationalDogPress © Articles "Scroll Down" Below This Cover Page.

Please "Scroll Down" to "Read" All Our News Articles!

======================================================================================

ACFInc.Large 

Dog owner “Due Process” is not contained in current Animal Law – The Questions and Answers


Due process is ‘not’ provided to dog owners in animal control ordinances before government authorities remove or euthanize their dogs from private property.


By Dean A. Ayers

Lead Investigative Reporter

NationalDogPress  ©

 

Updated: 17 February 2010



How Does Due Process Apply to Dog Seizure/Euthanasia Cases?

Despite the fact that animals are still considered property in all legal jurisdictions today, due process, whether rooted in the federal or state constitutions, extends to life, liberty, or property. The more complicated issue, however, is how much process is due?



The Supreme Court has promulgated a four prong test to determine this. In each situation, a court must weigh:

-the private interest affected by the official action

-the risk of an erroneous deprivation of that interest through the procedures used,

-the probable value of additional procedural safeguards, and

-the government interest involved.


Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 335 (1976).



Does Due process requires the opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner?

Rabon v. City of Seattle (Rabon II), 107 Wash.App. 734, 743 (2001) (citing Mathews, 424 U.S. at 333). Thus, when individuals can show they will suffer irreparable harm from a post-deprivation hearing, courts has recognized that a pre-deprivation hearing is necessary. In the case of orders to euthanize pets, many courts have considered the loss to the pet owner as irreparable.


Before any court hearing can dog owners file a Petition for a Preliminary Injunction?

Dog owners should file a petition for an injunction to delay the killing of the dog until they have had the chance to be heard in court (For an actual example, see Petition for Preliminary and Permanent Injunction in the case of Wilson v. City of St. Louis (1990), which involved a Pit Bull named "Max" who was impounded and classified as dangerous because he allegedly killed the neighbor’s dog. The Circuit Court found that the plaintiff would suffer irreparable harm if the preliminary injunction was not granted and enjoined the city from killing or otherwise harming Max. The court ordered the city to release Max and change his dangerous designation to potentially dangerous.)


Is there any way of overriding a bad decision by a petition for a writ of Mandamus?

Due process includes more than just going through the motions of a hearing. In fact, even after hearings have been granted, decisions can be challenged as a prejudicial abuse of discretion that is not based on findings of fact or law. (This is what the owners of Boo, a bull mastiff who allegedly bit a child, argued in Williams v. Orange County Animal Control (1996)). In this case, owners should file a Petition for a Writ of Mandamus, a judicial remedy issued by a superior court to compel a government officer to do or forbear from doing a specific act, to delay the euthanasia order until the appeal can be heard. This writ of mandamus applies in any situation in which the euthanasia should be stayed, including scenarios in which an original hearing was never given.


What are the minimum standards of Due Process for a hearing for dog owners?

It is now also clear that hearings must meet certain minimum standards. Informal reviews that animal control agencies frequently provide upon the dog owners request often do not fulfill these requirements, because the decision-maker may not be qualified to render the judgment or may not be impartial if he also made the original decision to euthanize the dog. For example, in Phillips v San Luis Obispo County Dept., 228 Cal.Rptr. 101 Cal.App. (2 Dist., 1986), the owners of Missy, a black lab known to have a bad habit of biting children, contested the city’s decision to euthanize her. The amicus brief filed by Joyce Tischler of the Animal Legal Defense Fund pointed out the Municipal Codes at issue did not provide for the Animal Regulation Directors orders to be reviewed by the Chief Sanitarian of the County Health Department or the supervising environmental health officer, the two individuals who presided over the first and second hearings.


Are there any challenges to the animal ordinance itself?

In fact, many city ordinances are flawed in that they fail to specify that owners are entitled to hearings before their pets are euthanized. These municipal codes can be challenged as unconstitutional and, even if the city already granted hearings that met minimum due process standards, the decision to euthanize the pet would still have to be overturned. Otherwise, whether dog owners generally would receive due process would be at the whim of the animal control agency, and the city could avoid having to correct its municipal codes simply by voluntarily giving all dog owners a hearing. The court of appeals in Missy's case agreed, concluding that the ordinances here are unconstitutional for failure to provide for notice and a hearing either before or after the seizure of an uncontrollable biting or vicious dog.

Most recently, in a landmark case, the court of appeals in Mansour v. King County, 128 P.3d 1241 (Wash.App. Div. 1, 2006) held that due process required even more than offering owners a hearing, ordering that an agency seeking to enforce a removal order must prove both the violation and the remedy it has imposed by a preponderance of the evidence. This is the same standard of proof imposed on the government when it attempts to temporarily remove a child from the custody of his parents. By instituting a burden of proof on the city, the court was essentially finding that the dog must be presumed innocent until the city can prove otherwise. Previously, there had been no standard of proof, and reviewing courts would only look to see if Animal Control had acted arbitrarily or capriciously. Thus, even the most minimal evidence that a dog should be removed would suffice, and owners would bear the burden of proving their pets innocent. Moreover, the court found that due process attached not only for orders to euthanize an animal, but also for orders of removal outside the county (Peter Mansour had been ordered to remove his dog from the county or turn his dog over to the city to be euthanized after his dog was accused of killing a cat).

Finally, the court held that due process required Mansour to have the ability to subpoena records and witnesses in his defense, and that the Notice and Order of Violation had to specify exactly what code provisions had been violated. Merely issuing a brief and concise description of the conditions for finding the violation is insufficient. Mansour was entitled to know ahead of time exactly what the County needed to prove at the Board hearing. If in fact it could not prove that Maxine violated a code provision that supported the removal order, he [Mansour] was entitled to know that in time to move for a dismissal at the Board level. Source Reference: Animal Legal and Historical Center.


Are there some significant problems with animal care, control, and dangerous dog laws and euthanasia execution solutions?

1. They do not reduce the number of neglect, abuse, or dog bite incidents that are legitimate in law. By focusing on the after-effects of the animal complaint of alleged neglect, abuse or a dog bite, these laws do not take any measures to prevent future neglect, abuse, animal care, pet owner control, or prevent dog bites. In theory, the risk of animal care and control ordinance punishment is for a motivation to change behavior. But most dog owners do not believe their dogs to be dangerous or the owners to be abusive or neglectful. So the perception is that these animal care and control laws are for 'other' dogs, problem dogs, but not their dog. Then, when a dog complaint, incident or dog bite allegedly occurs, that particular dog owner may face additional liability, but his/her friends and neighbors will not change their habits regarding their own dogs. These animal care and control laws 'do not' work as a viable solution.

2. The animal laws do not take into account the severity of the incident. Most animal care, control and dangerous dog laws cover a huge range of behavior from "threatening displays" to actual bites to simple care, and control of the dog(s). What this means is that you may be as liable for your goofy social dog rushing out the door and charging gleefully at a neighbor as another owner is for an under socialized, aggressive dog who bites a child on the face. Are these equal? Under many dangerous dog laws, they are. Additionally, animal care and control laws are intentionally 'vague' and 'interpretive' by animal control authorities. Thus the facts of alleged animal care and control, is rarely 'pure' and never 'simple.' And may not even be factually the 'truth' except by a personal (opinion) 'interpretation' of the animal control authority.


What does a lack of “due process” for dog owners come down to?


Dangerous dog laws, and animal care and control laws are a feel-good attempt to show the community that that authorities are taking action, even with a simple animal care or control complaint or a dog bite incident.

Unfortunately these animal laws do not provide any protective effects to change animal - owner behavior, merely punishment after the fact. There are many things that a community can do to prevent dog bites, animal neglect, animal abuse, or other care and control issues, including educating dog owners, parents, rural families or farmers, and citizens how to supervise and when to intervene in kid-and-dog, or dog-and-dog, interactions, teaching dog owners how to socialize and train their dogs with methods that encourage friendly behavior and providing some basic animal education about canine body language so the many misunderstandings we have with dogs each day can be reduced in their care and control issues.

Dog owners need to learn how to defend their dogs from ‘rogue’ Animal Control Authorities before they are confiscated, seized, and euthanized before you (as the dog owner) can obtain Legal Counsel.

 

More questions and answers we need to ask about “Due Process”.


DUE PROCESS is what is missing from the ordinance of animal laws, which are in force in most jurisdictions today.

 

1. WHAT DOES A PERSON DO, IF YOU ARE FACED WITH DOG CONFISCATION OR EUTHANASIA ISSUES BEFORE COURT?

It is necessary that you seek counsel from an attorney BEFORE you allow any authority to confiscate your dogs, pets, or animals, and ask the attorney to intervene with authorities to stop the process, based on a review of their animal laws being used, that DO NOT contain DUE PROCESS for the pet owners according to law case precedent established in this article and case law. In this way it is very likely the confiscation can be stopped or overturned, based on an unconstitutional law.

 

2. HOW CAN A DOG OWNER ESTABLISH "DUE PROCESS" IN ANIMAL LAW WHEN NOT IN A PRESENT DOG CONFISCATION CASE?

It is necessary to make enough flack or waves, thru getting the word out to your local animal control legislators for the jurisdiction you are in, to make them see the light, that current animal control laws and ordinances are UNCONSTITUTIONAL, as they DO NOT contain the lawful DUE PROCESS established by these case precedents in this article containing the case law establishing the requirements for DUE PROCESS before confiscation or euthanasia. It will take aggressive campaigning and raising the flag to the locals to get a campaign going for animal control law reform in your local town, county, and state. But this needs to be done, to change the law to protect the pet owners from the current level of tyranny without law controls on THEM.

 

3. HOW IS FIGHTING FOR "DUE PROCESS" IN ANIMAL LAW THAT IS NEEDED, GOING TO BE COSTLY TO THE POCKET BOOK?

The fastest and most public attention gathering method to change the animal laws to include the DUE PROCESS in this article is to have an attorney file a lawsuit against the jurisdiction, CHALLENGING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY of the animal law currently in force. When you establish thru evidence of the LACK OF DUE PROCESS IN THEIR ANIMAL LAWS, in court in a law suit, the Judge will have no alternative but to OVERTURN the current animal law, and it will be thrown out (the law will be) like the dish water for being Unconstitutional and vague. Thus the animal law is nullified, and no longer in force, at that moment, and the legislators will have to START OVER in creating a new animal law, that INCLUDES the ruling of a need for Constitutional DUE PROCESS included in the local animal law.

 

4. It is not as simple as just telling an animal control authority, that there is NO Due Process in their animal law?

Animal Control like cops will do ANYTHING they DAMN WELL PLEASED to you, UNTIL, and UNLESS, you OBTAIN AN ATTORNEY, to establish legal precedents to stop them. It ALWAYS comes down to working thru an attorney, BEFORE the pets or animals are confiscated or euthanized.  The word needs to spread, that people, need top have A PLAN OF ACTION, and ATTORNEY AT HAND, BEFORE they are ever faced with Animal Control, in order to stop them from tyranny. If Animal Control, knocks on your door, and you refuse them entry. You have only the amount of time, it takes for them to obtain a search and seizure warrant from a judge, and their time to come back to you, in order for YOU TO GET AN ATTORNEY AND START THIS NEGOTIATION PROCESS OD DUE PROCESS, if your animal laws do NOT contain the Proper Due Process in the current Animal Laws (which almost every Animal Law in the nation does NOT have).

 

5. What must be done, by every citizen with a pet, to get DUE PROCESS in their jurisdiction?

First off, GET AN ATTORNEY, to represent you, in each case listed above. Preferably an Attorney at Law WITH some experience in Animal Law.


REMEMBER, "THE TRUTH IS RARELY PURE AND NEVER SIMPLE IN ANIMAL LAW!"

 ###

 Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit)


"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."



PLEASE
 DONATE to Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) BY CLICKING ON THE PAYPAL LINK BELOW: 

 https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=6721925

Fair Use Notice:
 Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 

Legal Disclaimer:
  The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.
 

Copyright © 2006-2010, 
 Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) Iowa 2009, NationalDogPress News, All Rights Reserved
 

This article has been updated. It was originally Posted by Dean A. Ayers, Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom on 10/27/2009 at 12:43 AM in "Due Process" Before Animal Control Takes Your DogA Chicken Lesson for Dog OwnersAnimal ControlAnimal Control OfficersAnimal Shelter RIver Filling With DogsBad Smelling PetsBooksC.L.U.B. QUOTECurrent AffairsDog and Human Euthanasia UnethicalDog CatchersDog Insurance RequirementsDog LawDog License Tyranny,Dog Ordinance TyrannyDog Owner "Due Process" THE LAW or LACK of!Dog Rescue Action NeededDogs, Pets, and AnimalsDue Process in Animal LawsEuthanasiaFilmFlaming Liberal SwordsFood and DrinkFreedom and HappinessGamesGlenwoodIowa.orgHealth CareHEALTH CARE ALERTHumane Health Care?Humane Society ScamINSANITY in SocietyIslam and TerrorismIslam, Muslims, and DogsLife's TroublesMills County, IowaMillsCounty.OrgMusicMy Dogs...NAIS Animal IDNationalDogPress NewsletterNebraska Humane Society - NOT!NincompoopsNo Dogs in Canada and the USA Obama "Walking Eagle"ObamaCareOur Nation Won't SurvivePet Euthanasia is UnethicalPet FoodPETA DEATH CAMPSPrivate Property IntrusionReligion,RFID ChipsRFID Chips in Dogs, No Way!Sarah Palin Sarah Palin HELP!ScienceSexual Harassment Must Go!,Socialist AmericaSportsSwine Flu Fraud?TelevisionThank You!Toxins on Dogs and Our PetsTravel,Web/TechWeblogs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Digg This | Save to del.icio.us

=====================================================================================

NationalDogPress © News Alert 

NationalDogPress News Alert 

NationalDogPress © News Alert 

 

Aspartame has been renamed and is now being marketed as a natural sweetener

Friday, February 12, 2010 by: Ethan Huff

(NaturalNews) In response to growing awareness about the dangers of artificial sweeteners, what does the manufacturer of one of the world's most notable artificial sweeteners do? Why, rename it and begin marketing it as natural, of course. This is precisely the strategy of Ajinomoto, maker of aspartame, which hopes to pull the wool over the eyes of the public with its rebranded version of aspartame, called "AminoSweet".

Over 25 years ago, aspartame was first introduced into the European food supply. Today, it is an everyday component of most diet beverages, sugar-free desserts, and chewing gums in countries worldwide. But the tides have been turning as the general public is waking up to the truth about artificial sweeteners like aspartame and the harm they cause to health. The latest aspartame marketing scheme is a desperate effort to indoctrinate the public into accepting the chemical sweetener as natural and safe, despite evidence to the contrary.

Aspartame was an accidental discovery by James Schlatter, a chemist who had been trying to produce an anti-ulcer pharmaceutical drug for G.D. Searle & Company back in 1965. Upon mixing aspartic acid and phenylalanine, two naturally-occurring amino acids, he discovered that the new compound had a sweet taste. The company merely changed its FDA approval application from drug to food additive and, voila, aspartame was born.

G.D. Searle & Company first patented aspartame in 1970. An internal memo released in the same year urged company executives to work on getting the FDA into the "habit of saying yes" and of encouraging a "subconscious spirit of participation" in getting the chemical approved.

G.D. Searle & Company submitted its first petition to the FDA in 1973 and fought for years to gain FDA approval, submitting its own safety studies that many believed were inadequate and deceptive. Despite numerous objections, including one from its own scientists, the company was able to convince the FDA to approve aspartame for commercial use in a few products in 1974, igniting a blaze of controversy.

In 1976, then FDA Commissioner Alexander Schmidt wrote a letter to Sen. Ted Kennedy expressing concern over the "questionable integrity of the basic safety data submitted for aspartame safety". FDA Chief Counsel Richard Merrill believed that a grand jury should investigate G.D. Searle & Company for lying about the safety of aspartame in its reports and for concealing evidence proving the chemical is unsafe for consumption.

Despite the myriad of evidence gained over the years showing that aspartame is a dangerous toxin, it has remained on the global market with the exception of a few countries that have banned it. In fact, it continued to gain approval for use in new types of food despite evidence showing that it causes neurological brain damage, cancerous tumors, and endocrine disruption, among other things.

The details of aspartame's history are lengthy, but the point remains that the carcinogen was illegitimately approved as a food additive through heavy-handed prodding by a powerful corporation with its own interests in mind. Practically all drugs and food additives are approved by the FDA not because science shows they are safe but because companies essentially lobby the FDA with monetary payoffs and complete the agency's multi-million dollar approval process.

Changing aspartame's name to something that is "appealing and memorable", in Ajinomoto's own words, may hoodwink some but hopefully most will reject this clever marketing tactic as nothing more than a desperate attempt to preserve the company's multi-billion dollar cash cow. Do not be deceived.

Sources:

Ajinomoto brands aspartame 'AminoSweet' - FoodBev.com


Aspartame History Highlights - Janet Starr Hull

 

FDA's approval of aspartame under scrutiny - The Globe and Mail (Canada)


 An Overdue Ban On A Dangerous Sweetener - Huffington Post 


  http://www.linkedin.com/in/AnimalsClubFreedom 


Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit)


"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."



PLEASE
 DONATE to Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) BY CLICKING ON THE PAYPAL LINK BELOW: 

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=6721925

Fair Use Notice:
 Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 

Legal Disclaimer:
  The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.
 

Copyright © 2006-2010,  Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) Iowa 2009, NationalDogPress News, All Rights Reserved
 

National Dog Press Magazine

The New Revelation of Animal Rights vs. Animal War-fare

The New Revelation of Animal Rights vs. Animal War-fare

I have endeavored to bring out the "truth" of what "reality" is, or will be, in the “Matrix” of this global animal war in animal law.

By Dean A. Ayers

Lead Investigative Reporter

NationalDogPress ©

30 January 2010

I AM endeavoring to bring out the "truth" of what "reality" is, or will be, in the “Matrix” of the Animal “War-fare” competing for power and authority in animal legislation by the animal rights activists, or any individual, club, group, organization, etc. in defending their chosen side of battle in the animal law wars being created in society, on a global scale each and every day to ultimately control the people, thru the animal laws on their pets and other animals.

"With a stroke of the pen, regulations, directives, orders, laws, etc., "de facto" in nature and vice, Federal, State, and Local, in our own Nation and around the globe, are contrived in “secret combinations" by the Oppressor's, for the purpose of eliminating the U.S. Constitution, and all that it provides, and this warlike agenda will "slowly" and "quietly" remove all Liberties and Freedoms, beginning with the Animal Rights legislative agendas.

 

Now you ask, so how does this affect me and my animals?

Wake up soon, my good people and you will see "RFID"… in Pet ID Tags, Dog ID Tags, and Cat ID Tags for your lovely pets with cattle tags, hog tags, goat tags horse tags at the Vet. You will have to get.

 

Now do you think you will still be Free?

FEES! FINES! CONFISCATIONS! Until your Animal Dies (by mandatory legislated euthanasia)! Will you fight the war between the Animal Rights vs. Animal Welfare battling to control your freedom to own and maintain your own dogs, cats, pets and animals?

The Animal Rights agendas won't get past the testimony that I know and I believe in faith that my pets and animals do have eternal souls. I am their protector, their defender, which by my fight with honor, I will uphold! 

By "on HIGH" am I "inspired" to "honor" my pets and animals. Not you Animal Rights activists, in your wake of your animal war's blood bath. I will “stand my ground” in my Right's and Freedom's to defend my pets and animals, No matter what YOU say. God given Constitutional rights are at stake, as our pets and animals have true souls of life and we are "duty" bound to stay in the fight with the Animal Rights. vs. Animal Welfare wars and battles, so they will not take my Animals and "My Rights" away.

 

Their little animal souls will still be around

I want to make something clear to you all in this article, about "Truth," "Justice," and the "American Way." Animal Laws are only words written on paper, words that change on society's whim and are interpreted differently daily by politicians, lawyers, judges, animal control authorities, and even policemen.

Anyone who believes that all animal laws should always be obeyed would have made a fine slave catcher. Anyone who believes that all animal laws are applied equally, despite race, breed, religion, or economic status, is a fool. We cannot, by total reliance on current animal law, escape the duty to judge them right and wrong.

There are good animal laws and animal regulations, and there are occasionally bad animal laws or regulations, and it conforms to the highest traditions of a free society to offer resistance to "bad" animal laws or regulations, and to "disobey" them thru lawful debate, legal challenges and freedom of speech to bring the "shadows" of the Animal Rights alleged "back door" lobbied agendas out into the light of truth from the Animal Rights “Matrix” of their spoon fed propaganda agendas.

Am I not destroying my animal rights activist enemies when I make friends of them, using God's word of power and authority in telling them the truth of the light in Animal Welfare, not their Animal's Right? Never undertake anything for which you wouldn't have the courage to ask the blessings of heaven to accomplish your tasks in order to protect and defend your pets and animals.

Speak what you think today in the Animal Wars, in words as hard and bold as cannon-balls; and tomorrow speak what tomorrow thinks, in hard and bold words again to stop the “perverted” animal laws, though it contradict everything you said today; if that be Right, under God, to Preserve Thee and your dogs, cats, pets, and animals on your own private property; you see.

The Motto for this article is: For "I AM" a man or woman, who is firm in the Faith of freedom and I, have "SWORN WITH AN OATH" to defend my rights, & my dogs, pets and animals from all tyranny and from the animal rights agendas, or the elitist power of any animal welfare individual, group, or organization, that wants to stifle my “freedom of speech" or my rights on private property to responsibly own my pets and animals without any tyranny intrusion.

Only in this, "light" of God, "on HIGH," will you, or I, be able to "repeal" the evil of the Animal Oppressor's of men and women in animal law activism, and their mighty stroke of their alleged “lobbied” legislative pen,  to steal your private property premise's, your pets and animal's, and ultimately, yourselves, thru all their animal laws, with their fees, fines, and confiscations, all in the name of  Your protection and animal welfare to be controlled with you having No Rights.

 

Now you ask, so how does this affect me and my dogs, cats, and pets?

So I say…

Wake up soon, my good people globally, and you will see whether you believe in "me" or not in what and how, “I say!" You will be RFID "Chipped" as will all your pets and animals and your Freedom will be slowly "Chipped" away!

By the Animal Rights agendas and their animal laws in furthering the altered legislations taking your “common sense” in traditional animal care in responsibility, animal welfare control and your right to naturally preserve your pets and animals responsibly on your own private property, will by their “manipulation” of animal laws and their "mandatory" animal regulations take your pets and animals away from any legitimate and legal ownership of them using their animal law of legislating their war-fare.

 

One Fine Day!

“In a cursory summary I say, The “Mark of the Beast” global animal law scenario is only one small puppy-baby step away from your door step. Take my good people with pets and animals. Do not turn away.

 

This temporal and spiritual Animal “War” continues

It's hard to comprehend, that the leadership of virtually all the largest and most profitable "non-profit" lobbying Animal Rights organizations have such ambitious goals in mind.

“Animal Welfare” is concerned with common sense, health, safety, quality of life, and the future of our animals safety, health and responsible welfare in our personal care.

vs.

“Animal Rights” views domestic animal ownership as "slavery" and seeks to destroy the domestic pet and animal by whatever means necessary. Their most effective way to accomplish this animal rights agenda is by using alleged lobbied lawmakers to pass prohibitive animal laws, such as mandatory spay/neuter, dangerous dog laws, or potential dangerous dog designations laws, or breed specific ordinances (BSL) which includes any dog or animal that even “looks like” a banned BSL breed whether it is or not, in actuality.

Their ends Justify the Means by War.  These animal activist legislative legal definitions and designation abuses of “perverting” animal law are the sure result of the Animal Rightists campaign to wage death and destruction on our beloved dogs, pets and animals. Again, the "ends justify the means".

The alleged quotes by the Leaders and Activists in the Animal Rights vs. Animal Welfare War:


• "Anybody who shoots a pit bull running loose is justified,'' Kory Nelson, Assistant City Attorney of Denver, CO, San Francisco Chronicle, Monday, June 27, 2005 (Known all over as Denver's "Dr. Death of Dogs")

• "We have no ethical obligation to preserve the different breeds of livestock produced through selective breeding. . . One generation and out. We have no problem with the extinction of domestic animals. They are creations of human selective breeding." Wayne Pacelle, Senior VP of Humane Society of the US, formerly of Friends of Animals and Fund for Animals, Animal People, May, 1993

NOTE: (Wayne Pacelle's initial training was similar to that of other PETA activists. Today he heads HSUS under the guise of "legitimacy". It is the largest and most profitable of the Animal Rightist lobbying organizations.

• "Pet ownership is an absolutely abysmal situation brought about by human manipulation." Ingrid Newkirk, national director, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), Just like Us? Harper's, August 1988, p. 50.

• "As John Bryant has written in his book Fettered Kingdoms, they [pets] are like slaves, even if well-kept slaves." PETA's Statement on Companion Animals.

• "We are not especially 'interested in' animals. Neither of us had ever been inordinately fond of dogs, cats, or horses in the way that many people are. We didn't 'love' animals." Peter Singer, Animal Liberation: A New Ethic for Our Treatment of Animals, 2nd ed. (New York Review of Books, 1990), Preface, p. ii.

• "Our goal: to convince people to rescue and adopt instead of buying or selling animals, to disavow the language and concept of animal ownership." Eliot Katz, President in Defense of Animals, In Defense of Animals website, 2001

• "It is time we demand an end to the misguided and abusive concept of animal ownership. The first step on this long, but just, road would be ending the concept of pet ownership." Elliot Katz, President "In Defense of Animals," spring 1997

• "The cat, like the dog, must disappear... We should cut the domestic cat free from our dominance by neutering, neutering, and more neutering, until our pathetic version of the cat ceases to exist." John Bryant, Fettered Kingdoms: An Examination of a Changing Ethic (Washington, DC: People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), 1982, p. 15.

• "My goal is the abolition of all animal agriculture." JP Goodwin employed at the Humane Society of the US, formerly at Coalition to Abolish the Fur Trade, as quoted on AR-Views, an animal rights Internet discussion group in 1996.

• "Man is the most dangerous, destructive, selfish, and unethical animal on earth." Michael W. Fox, Scientific Director and former Vice President, Humane Society of the United States, as quoted in Robert James Bidinotto"

• "We are not terrorists, but we are a threat. We are a threat both economically and philosophically. Our power is not in the right to vote but the power to stop production. We will break the law and destroy property until we win." Dr. Steven Best, speaking at International Animal Rights Gathering 2005. The Telegram (UK) July 17, 2005.

• "Arson, property destruction, burglary and theft are 'acceptable crimes' when used for the animal cause." Alex Pacheco, Director, PETA

• "Our nonviolent tactics are not as effective. We ask nicely for years and get nothing. Someone makes a threat, and it works." Ingrid Newkirk, PETA's founder and president, US News and World Report, April 8, 2002

• "I openly hope that it [hoof-and-mouth disease] comes here. It will bring economic harm only for those who profit from giving people heart attacks and giving animals a concentration camp-like existence. It would be good for animals, good for human health and good for the environment. Ingrid Newkirk, PETA founder and president, ABC News interview April 2, 2001

 

You don't believe in what I say?

An Animal’s Right vs. an Animal’s Welfare, War; continue on in relentless media battles and legislative proposal fights over the control and authority to dictate the animal laws, that determine your pet, animal care and control's legal freedoms (or lack of); No matter what YOU say. 

 ###

 http://www.linkedin.com/in/AnimalsClubFreedom


Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit)

"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."


PLEASE DONATE to Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) BY CLICKING ON THE PAYPAL LINK BELOW: 

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=6721925

Fair Use Notice:
 Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
Legal Disclaimer:
  The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.
 
Copyright © 2006-2010,  Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) Iowa 2009, NationalDogPress News, All Rights Reserved
 

Posted by Dean A. Ayers, Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom on 01/30/2010 at 12:34 AM in Animal Rights vs. Animal War-fare | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Digg This | Save to del.icio.us

The Impact of Animal Rights, Rescues, and Shelters on Animal Law

The Impact of Animal Rights, Rescues, and Shelters on Animal Law

 

The Impact of Animal Rights, Rescues, and Shelters on Animal Law

Where is the “over-population” when dogs and cats are transported across state lines and imported from foreign countries to fill up animal shelters?

 

By Dean A. Ayers

Lead Investigative Reporter

NationalDogPress  © 

2 January 2010

If your job has already been axed by the bad economy or is about to disappear, people can often do desperate things in an attempt to compensate.

Why should animal shelters be any different; especially when a person considers what is happing inside these organizations, many of which are run by animal rights activists and major big dollar supported nonprofit groups. Some are so passionate that they'd do nearly anything to keep their "humane society imperative" of their animal shelter/rescue agenda going. This information can assist in explaining why pet and animal "over-population stigma” is used as a marketing ploy for rescue and adoption industry to sell their agenda about dogs and cats (rescued for a fee) as being their alleged heroic duty of serving rescued and adopted out dogs and cats.

Tell a family that the dog they're interested in is about to be destroyed by euthanasia due to "lack of space", and the deal to adopt is closed. Another dog is then shipped in to take its place as the needed “chattel product” of this high dollar big animal “industry and nonprofit business” nationwide.

After mulling over the phenomenally successful statistics of voluntary spay/neuter by the general public, the question need to be asked; where are all the animal shelters/rescues getting their dogs? Regardless of the facts that most shelter dogs are adult dogs, sadly displaced for many reasons, like due to people moving to covenant-controlled homeowner associations and counties cities with extreme “pet limit” laws, the numbers in shelters do not add up.

Obviously, shelters should be going “out of business” left and right since voluntary spay/neuter nationwide is so successful. After a cursory review of nationwide available statistics it appears that animal euthanasia numbers have been increasing for 20 years, especially to eradicate the “bully breeds” yet, "over-population" is the “mantra” still used by animal shelters and animal rescues favoring their animal rights agendas for furthering their fund-raising, donations, and adopting for a fee (selling) dogs industry to an ill-informed public.

Even the numbers of irresponsible breeding “puppy mills” are nothing like people think it is. The animal rights groups nationwide have succumbed to now including “responsible” dog kennels with more than 50 dogs in perfect care and control conditions as being labeled as “puppy mills” now in their propaganda. Considering the successful voluntary rate of spay/neuter nationwide, it is highly unlikely that accidental pet owner breeding and true defined “puppy mill” irresponsible breeding are filling up animal shelters/rescues to the extent that animal rights groups and animal shelters/rescues claim they are. However, a nationwide dog “chattel” product for a fee industry(dog and cat rescues/adoptions) must come from somewhere.

 

Make a $$$ Profit (nonprofit) killing or be killed by euthanasia

The general public and all pet and animal owners need to be aware that Animal Rightists lobby with local Animal Shelters and Animal Rescues as “cover.”

The illegal, immoral and illicit care, cruelty and unethical practices in the shelter industry are shocking.  And make no mistake, it is a BIG DOLLAR ($$$) rescue/adoption for a fee industry.  Many animal rescues and shelters have become some of the most profitable pet shops around that kill anything that does not bring top dollar; or is too much work to place in adoption programs for an adoption or rescue fee. To “give away” a dog or cat, is politically incorrect and unacceptable in their animal rights agenda “chattel” industry. The only Animal Rescue/Shelter agenda acceptable for an “unadoptable” (for a fee) dog or cat is euthanasia, heralded as being so humane.

Single Breed and Pure Bred Rescue organizations have a dreadful time getting pure bred dogs and cats out of the shelter for a fee industry system, simply because shelters/rescues exploit these pure breeds to increase sales and profits (in the hundreds of dollars for a single pure bred dog or cat). Sadly, the “main stream” news media and general public have been willing to look the other way, always promoting the animal rights agenda “cause and effect” of these shelter and rescue illicit industry dog product “chattel” practices.


Why do some humane society shelters operate in this manner?

The answer is that many animal shelters and humane society agencies have become havens for Animal Rightists; shelters and rescues are exploited to spread propaganda, dog and cat "over-population" myths, and faulty statistics for marketing and donation receiving purposes. Shelters and Rescues naturally become a breeding ground for recruiting new uninformed members and animal rights activists. It's a natural, albeit unhealthy, fit to the animal rights adoption (for a fee) industry “chattel” agenda.

It is no wonder alleged dubious shelter operations are becoming an ever-increasing problem, importing dogs and cats to “over-populate” their agencies from out of state and foreign country animal sources. Thankfully, not all shelters/rescues are this way, but the public should be aware of what is going on.  Both Animal Control Authorities and Law enforcement who enforce animal laws and many animal shelters/rescues “have had” their ethics compromised, if not downright corrupted. The end-result is that generally, shelter/rescue workers and animal control authorities and their animal law enforcement agencies assisting them are no longer a credible source for accurate animal care and control information or about proper and constitutional animal behavior and breeding of quality pets, especially when it comes to crafting pet and animal laws.

Animal Rightist propaganda would have us believe that animal abuses and cruelty are at “epidemic” levels in the general public of pet owner’s homes and small hobby or one time family animal breeders, not to mention that dog attacks most certainly receive sensational press coverage.

The main stream media is only too happy to oblige any political opportunism by “animal rights lobbied” politicians, pro-animal control authorities, shelter/rescue agencies, and county or municipal law enforcement or government employees actively pursuing their own “Animal Rightist” agendas. Animal Rights designed animal ordinances have become a means to an end, exploited at the expense of the loving pet owners  being made into criminals without “proper and legal “due process” in animal law in our society and in the general public nationwide.

A major percentage of the nation’s animal population, dog attacks, dog fighting, and even animal cruelty and animal care and control or nuisance behavior complaints are rare when all the facts are allegedly disclosed nationwide.  As disturbing as these animal care, cruelty, and animal attack incidents are, they are not even close to being the rule... they are by far the exception. Thereby the Animal Rightists are utilizing the “exception to the rule” as an aggressive and nationwide opportunity to enact unconstitutional, intrusive, unethical, vague or illicit animal laws and animal ordinances in a horrendously distasteful and extremely dishonest manner of current and proposed animal law. 

When Animal Rightists write ordinances that “Sic” Animal Control Authorities, Animal Rightist Groups allegedly posing as Law enforcement (CA. PROP 2 laws enacting private nonprofit groups to act as law enforcement on private property) on animal owners and breeders via animal crating, care, control, licensing, pet-limits, and registration schemes in animal law, the very future of healthy well-tempered pets and animals is compromised. No breeding. No pure-bred animals. No healthy genetic stock. Hence, no more pets. No cats. No dogs. No nothing! Forever more! Except for the industry of rescue/shelter adoptions (for a fee).

The only way to prevent these unconstitutional, illegal, immoral, and illicit pet owner “confiscation and seizure” horrors from taking root in your own county and community is not to go there in the first place, in allowing these “perverted” animal laws and ordinances.  Again, only an open and active pet-friendly county and community create a fun and safe place to live with our pets and neighbors.  Animal Rightists, thru their BIG $$$ animal adoption and rescue industry (for a fee) are destroying our current animal laws in having any “common sense” or traditional, constitutional and “intrinsic value” for our pets and animals in the law governing our private property.

A disconcerting trend is sweeping America

The Disconcerting TREND…Costly and destructive animal laws and ordinances being constructed solely by the Animal Rightists with their “lobbied” legislators at all levels of government. The reason stems from an all-out effort by Animal Rightist organizations to lobby every single locale, township, county, city, and state in the U.S.A., Canada and even worldwide.  These Animal Rights Activists are searching out lawmakers to exploit and further their twisted and “perverted” agenda to destroy any authority or ability for a private property owner to legally retain and defend their pets and animals as their extended family.

It's hard to comprehend, but the leadership of the largest and most profitable "non-profit" lobbying Animal Rights organizations has an ambitious goal in mind: Destroying all usage and ownership of domestic animals. That includes, but is not limited to, abolishing pet ownership in every aspect of our society worldwide.

 

Animal Rightist History Recalled

Hitler and the Nazi Party used animal rights propaganda and veganism to turn neighbor against neighbor and to vilify the Jewish people and their traditions and culture. 

Dr. Martin Hulsey once a research scientist in the Department of Foods and Nutrition, University of Georgia, noted "In Nazi Germany, practices such as vivisection were characterized as Jewish (by relating them to the ritual of kosher slaughter) and thereby vilified. Subsequently, reverence for the "rights" of animals was used to justify the oppression of Jewish people." The laws and accusation of vivisection were often used as a pretext to prosecute Jewish scientists. In 1940, a discussion was started within the administration about prohibiting pets, in order to conserve foodstuffs for human consumption. But personal interference by Hitler stopped this proposal. Ultimately a decree was published by the administration against pets, but it referred only to the pets in the possession of non-Aryan citizens.

On February 15, 1942, a decree was published prohibiting Jews from keeping pets, which the Jews found humiliating, writes Boria Sax in his book, Animals in the Third Reich: Pets, Scapegoats, and the Holocaust.

Merritt Clifton from Animal People News notes that Sax details the 32 'animal protection laws' adopted by Nazi Germany in only 10 years, demonstrating that many and perhaps most were really just thinly disguised cover for oppression of Jews, gypsies, and other minorities. The first two banned kosher slaughter; the last one barred Jews from keeping pets." 

Animal Rightists know full-well that they are not conservative main-stream. However, they've been successful in influencing the American lexicon with politically correct words such as "over-population,"  “puppy mill,” and “dog attacks.” With major financial support from Hollywood Animal Rightists and an ill-informed public donating money, to include the pet owners themselves, these Animal Rightists and their pro-bono activists and “spoon fed” people spread their animal law propaganda, and inaccuracies about dog behavior. Their legislative proposal packets, slides, videos, etc. are allegedly filled with phony studies, quack testimony, faulty statistics, and other materials that are sent to county, city and state councils or legislators all over the country under the guise of being a reputable source. Once again, the “lame stream” news and main stream press have been all too happy to oblige, publishing sensationalized stories which trump up the credibility of such a nonsensical agenda.

What is missing from these news stories is that these groups do not care one whit about animals, or the welfare of animals, or the health and longevity of pets and animals. This is alleged by the fact of main stream press coverage to the effect that animal rights groups such as PETA, HSUS, or other groups alleged to be saving animals publicly claim to be helping dolphins, whales, polar bears, wolves, or elephants in Africa, etc. but these same groups are allegedly and simultaneously lobbying an all-out assault to destroy any ownership or breeding of dogs, cats, and the family pet at home. This is just plain “evil.”

 

Do you know the difference between Animal Welfare and Animal Rights?

“Animal Welfare” is concerned with health, safety, quality of life, and the future of our animals.

“Animal Rights” views domestic animal ownership as "slavery" and seeks to destroy the domestic animal by whatever means necessary. The fastest and most effective way to accomplish this agenda is by using lawmakers to pass prohibitive animal laws, such as mandatory spay/neuter, or breed specific ordinances (BSL) which includes any dog or animal that even “looks like” a BSL breed whether it is or not, in actuality.

The Ends Justify the Means.  These abuses of “perverting” animal law are the sure result of the Animal Rightists campaign to wage death and destruction on our beloved dogs, pets and animals. Again, the "ends justify the means".


What exactly is the end result of these animal laws?

Power to Control We the People thru our dogs, pets, and animals. The ensuing corruption contained within the intent to “pervert” influence in the animal laws and animal ordinances aids Animal Rights Activists in the accumulation of wielding more power over the people and to establish a “war chest” of financial wealth thru the very destruction of dog, cat, and pet ownership in animal law thru fees, fines, confiscations, seizures and criminal citations. Using and exploiting lawmakers wherever they deem necessary, the Animal Rightist goal of achieving power and wealth at public animal owner expense is in full force.

Even when lawmakers pursue their own agendas, where animal ordinances are concerned, the lawmaker is still a pawn of these Animal Rightist lobbyists. Allegedly by means of having lawmakers being “bought and paid for” thru major financial contributions and donations or other “perks” to get the law makers to make animal laws, according to the agendas of the Animal Rightists.

Fighting Animal Rightist Ideology and helping County, City or State Councils to Properly Reform our “perverted” Animal Rightist Law Agendas, is The Moral of This Story:   The lesson to be learned by We the People is that by the time Animal Rightists have taken our counties, municipalities and states hostage and “their” perverted animal laws and ordinances pass, no one knows what has hit them until it is way too late to react with any authority to act.

Animal law and ordinances quickly “compromise the ethics” of Animal Control Authorities and the Law Enforcement agencies enforcing Animal Law with vague and confusing statutes and wordage in the law. These ruthless and irresponsible “perverted” animal law policies are most certainly not something that should have been introduced into animal law; let alone, considered, passed, and enforced by lawmakers and enforced by Law Enforcement. A majority of all these laws “ARE” Unconstitutional. However, it takes a major financial investment and good animal law attorney to be retained at a premium cost, to fight these “unconstitutional” animal laws, that have no “due process” and that is not something the majority of the people can afford to do. These Animal Rightist and lawmakers “know this” and bank on it.

 

If Anyone Doubts how Serious Things Have Become, Please Read the Following:

The alleged quotes by the Leaders and Activists within the Animal Rightists Movement…

• "Anybody who shoots a pit bull running loose is justified,'' Kory Nelson, Assistant City Attorney of Denver, CO, San Francisco Chronicle, Monday, June 27, 2005 (Known all over as Denver's "Dr. Death of Dogs")

• "We have no ethical obligation to preserve the different breeds of livestock produced through selective breeding. . . One generation and out. We have no problem with the extinction of domestic animals. They are creations of human selective breeding." Wayne Pacelle, Senior VP of Humane Society of the US, formerly of Friends of Animals and Fund for Animals, Animal People, May, 1993

NOTE: (Wayne Pacelle's initial training was similar to that of other PETA activists. Today he heads HSUS under the guise of "legitimacy". It is the largest and most profitable of the Animal Rightist lobbying organizations.

• "Pet ownership is an absolutely abysmal situation brought about by human manipulation." Ingrid Newkirk, national director, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), Just Like Us? Harper's, August 1988, p. 50.

• "As John Bryant has written in his book Fettered Kingdoms, they [pets] are like slaves, even if well-kept slaves." PETA's  Statement on Companion Animals.

• "We are not especially 'interested in' animals. Neither of us had ever been inordinately fond of dogs, cats, or horses in the way that many people are. We didn't 'love' animals." Peter Singer, Animal Liberation: A New Ethic for Our Treatment of Animals, 2nd ed. (New York Review of Books, 1990), Preface, p. ii.

• "Our goal: to convince people to rescue and adopt instead of buying or selling animals, to disavow the language and concept of animal ownership." Eliot Katz, President In Defense of Animals, In Defense of Animals website, 2001

• "It is time we demand an end to the misguided and abusive concept of animal ownership. The first step on this long, but just, road would be ending the concept of pet ownership." Elliot Katz, President "In Defense of Animals," Spring 1997

• "The cat, like the dog, must disappear... We should cut the domestic cat free from our dominance by neutering, neutering, and more neutering, until our pathetic version of the cat ceases to exist." John Bryant, Fettered Kingdoms: An Examination of A Changing Ethic (Washington, DC: People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), 1982, p. 15.

• "My goal is the abolition of all animal agriculture." JP Goodwin, employed at the Humane Society of the US, formerly at Coalition to Abolish the Fur Trade, as quoted on AR-Views, an animal rights Internet discussion group in 1996.

• "Man is the most dangerous, destructive, selfish, and unethical animal on earth." Michael W. Fox, Scientific Director and former Vice President, Humane Society of the United States, as quoted in Robert James Bidinotto"

• "We are not terrorists, but we are a threat. We are a threat both economically and philosophically. Our power is not in the right to vote but the power to stop production. We will break the law and destroy property until we win." Dr. Steven Best, speaking at International Animal Rights Gathering 2005. The Telegram (UK) July 17, 2005.

• "Arson, property destruction, burglary and theft are 'acceptable crimes' when used for the animal cause." Alex Pacheco, Director, PETA

• "Our nonviolent tactics are not as effective. We ask nicely for years and get nothing. Someone makes a threat, and it works." Ingrid Newkirk, PETA's founder and president, US News and World Report, April 8, 2002

• "I openly hope that it [hoof-and-mouth disease] comes here. It will bring economic harm only for those who profit from giving people heart attacks and giving animals a concentration camp-like existence. It would be good for animals, good for human health and good for the environment. Ingrid Newkirk, PETA founder and president, ABC News interview April 2, 2001

 

So how do “We the People” take back our Constitutional Rights in Animal Law?

ANSWER: Courage to Defend Your Private Property, and Your Animals at all costs!

 

"Courage is not defined by a person's ability to speak their mind, yelling like a lion's bellow at authorities and lawmakers about proposed or enacted bad animal laws. Courage is an action of humility, putting one's cause of honor, before his/her life, to retain the freedom and liberty, which We as People, seek, from an honorable and just God to defend our pets and animals, from oppressive men and women in their secret combinations of Animal Rights law making agendas." ~ Quote Authored by Dean A. Ayers, NationalDogPress ©

###

 Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit)


"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."


Fair Use Notice:
 Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 

Legal Disclaimer:
  The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.
 

Copyright © 2006-2010,  Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) Iowa 2009, NationalDogPress News, All Rights Reserved
 

Posted by Dean A. Ayers, Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom on 01/02/2010 at 01:48 AM in "Due Process" Before Animal Control Takes Your Dog"Mark of the Beast" in Obama Care'We the People' with dogs and animalsA Chicken Lesson for Dog OwnersALASKA Takes On SARAH PALINAlleged Dog or Animal Abuse News,Animal ControlAnimal Control OfficersAnimal LawAnimal LawsAnimal RescuesAnimal Rights Activists,Animal Shelter RIver Filling With DogsAnimal SheltersAnimals C.L.U.B.- Freedom 50 + Article LinksBad Smelling PetsBooksC.L.U.B. QUOTECat Executions in Omaha, NebraskaCatholic Church PETA Sex Offends,Citizen Dog Walkers Current AffairsDebating the Humane SocietyDemoRATS Pass ObamaCare RFID Chipping,Doctor DEATHDog and Human Euthanasia UnethicalDog CatchersDog Insurance RequirementsDog Kennel Owner AbuseDog LawDog LawsDog License TyrannyDog Ordinance TyrannyDog Owner "Due Process" THE LAW or LACK of!Dog Rescue Action NeededDog Taxation Dog TaxesDogs, Pets, and AnimalsDUE PROCESS,Due Process in Animal LawsDweebs in Animal ControlEuthanasiaFilmFisherman TAKE ON Sarah Palin, WOW!,Flaming Liberal SwordsFood and DrinkFort Hood, Texas MUSLIM GunmanFreedom and HappinessFreedom and LibertyFreedom to own dogs, pets and animalsGamesGlenwood, IowaGlenwoodIowa.orgGovernment Owned DogsGovt. Owns YOUR Computer Info.H1N1 Cat Flu ConfirmedHealing Power of DogsHealth Care,HEALTH CARE ALERTHealthcare, Taxes, Public Option, and BULLSHITHSUSHSUS Alleged Criminal Activity,HSUS Alleged Intimidation of Free SpeechHSUS Allegedly Impersonating Law Enforcement in CA Prop 2HSUS and PETA Exaggeration into LiesHSUS Intimidation DebateHSUS law enforcement training campsHumane Health Care?Humane Society of the United StatesHumane Society ScamIMPEACH OBAMAINSANITY in Society,Iowa Puppy Mill Bull!Islam and TerrorismIslam, Muslims, and DogsLife's TroublesMills County, IowaMills County, Iowa MillsCounty.OrgMormon Prophecy about the USAMusicMuslim Major Tied to 9/11MUSLIM U.S. Army GunmanMy Dogs...NAIS Animal IDNationalDogPress NewsletterNationalDogPress©,NationalDogPress© Magazine CoverNEA Teachers UnionNebraska Humane Society - NOT!NincompoopsNo Dogs in Canada and the USA Non-Voters For Companion Animals SatireObama "Walking Eagle"Obama State Dinner Gate - SatireOBAMA Transition Team Has MUSLIM MurdererObamaCareObamanationOur Nation Won't SurvivePet Euthanasia is UnethicalPet FoodPETAPETA DEATH CAMPSPETA PORN ADSPolk County "Number Limit" TyrannyPrivate Property IntrusionPROP 2Puppy Mill Bull!ReligionRFID ChipsRFID Chips in Dogs, No Way!Rogue in 2012Sarah Palin Sarah Palin or Satire SARAH PALIN FOR PRESIDENT in 2012Sarah Palin HELP!SatireScienceSexual Harassment Must Go!Socialist AmericaSportsSwine Flu Fraud?Teachers ,TelevisionTerrorist Designation for PETAThank You!The HSUS, the MOB, and the Black EGGThe MOBThe Religion of the DogToxins on Dogs and Our PetsTravelUSDAUSDA ACCESS WARNINGWeb/TechWeblogs,Welfare State | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Digg This | Save to del.icio.us

The HSUS, the MOB, and the 'Black EGG' Humane Society of the United States

The HSUS, the MOB, and the 'Black EGG' Humane Society of the United States

 


NationalDogPress ©

 


 

"Once in the racket you're always in it."

Al Capone


Make sure you have your seat belts on and lets proceed.

In this NationalDogPress © Magazine Issue on the HSUS



  • The MOB, H$U$ and the Black EGG
  • THE MOB
  • ENTER H$U$
  • BEST FRIENDS - KNUCKLING UNDER TO H$U$ TAKE OVER?
  • H$U$ - Humane $ociety of the United $tates
  • THE BLACK EGG
  • California State Legislature Votes To Pay H$U$ Protection Money
  • EDITOR'S NOTE. . .
  • Disclaimer
  • Title 17 U.S.C. section 107


The MOB, H$U$ and the Black EGG


THE MOB



Scarface Capone would have been proud of the Mafia's advance into mainstream America and world markets. Organized crime in the last 80 years has become highly educated and extremely sophisticated. Children of the Mafiosi had the money to attend Princeton, Harvard, Columbia and Yale to obtain the best educations in Environmental and Political Science, Law, Business and Non Profit Law. It is common knowledge that the Feds could not take down Capone in any other way but through the Internal Revenue Service. What would be a dream come true for the mob and its rackets would be a business that one could launder money through, lots of money, far beyond what the old Italian restaurant money laundering racket served up. What better "racket" than Non Profit organizations, layered and affiliated for money laundering ease, and best of all, EXEMPT from taxes. 

While at college, these next generation soon-to-be professionals with credentials and degrees often become involved in Environmentalism courtesy of ultra left professors such as Peter Singer. Singer is the master of indoctrination and manipulation of these young students that come to study at Harvard and Princeton. He is well known as the "Father of the Animal Rights Movement" which he admits was an experiment with a political social movement class. He admittedly cares nothing for animals, or for that matter, humans as one can ascertain from many of his statements such as "killing a newborn baby is never equivalent to killing a person, that is, a being who wants to go on living."[29] Obama recently appointed him as advisor to Cass Sunstein, the Harvard law professor, who is Obama's nominee to head the White House Office of Information and Regulatory affairs - the so-called "regulation czar". Singer advocates the moral equality of humans and animals. 

When Singer's appointment to Princeton's faculty was announced in 1998, billionaire alumnus and presidential candidate Steve Forbes pledged not to give a dime to the school until he left the faculty. Nonetheless, Singer is still advising students and teaching "Practical Ethics," one of the most popular courses at the university. How did Singer, an atheist, become the God of Ethics? Isn't this the same attitude that Hitler possessed? Many that have studied Singer believe he emulates Hitler and has had a perverse fixation on the Fuhrer since early childhood. How Singer can then twist the atrocities of the Nazis into an argument for bioethics is mind-boggling considering that Hitler and the Nazi Party used animal rights propaganda and veganism to turn neighbor against neighbor and to vilify the Jewish people and their traditions and culture. 

Dr. Martin Hulsey once a research scientist in the Department of Foods and Nutrition, University of Georgia, noted "In Nazi Germany, practices such as vivisection were characterized as Jewish (by relating them to the ritual of kosher slaughter) and thereby vilified. Subsequently, reverence for the "rights" of animals was used to justify the oppression of Jewish people." The laws and accusation of vivisection were often used as a pretext to prosecute Jewish scientists. [10] In 1940, a discussion was started within the administration about prohibiting pets, in order to conserve foodstuffs for human consumption. But personal interference by Hitler stopped this proposal. Ultimately a decree was published by the administration against pets, but it referred only to the pets in the possession of non-Aryan citizens.[23] On February 15, 1942, a decree was published prohibiting Jews from keeping pets,[20] which the Jews found humiliating.[23] writes Boria Sax in his book, Animals in the Third Reich: Pets, Scapegoats, and the Holocaust.

Merritt Clifton from Animal People News notes that Sax details the 32 'animal protection laws' adopted by Nazi Germany in only 10 years, demonstrating that many and perhaps most were really just thinly disguised cover for oppression of Jews, gypsies, and other minorities. The first two banned kosher slaughter; the last one barred Jews from keeping pets." 

Combine the animal rights movement and organized crime and the result is one of the biggest scams in American corporate history. The animal rights movement has taken over the animal welfare charities also referred to as non profit 501(c)3 corporations. 

Non profits pay no taxes and are rarely audited. There is really no oversight set up for the non profits so it is easy to abuse what used to be public charity funds. Al Capone would be proud. Tax free money hires high dollar lobbyists to control Congress and state legislatures. The non profit corporations in turn write legislation that are voted into laws favorable for them. To get cooperation from politicians, campaign coffers overflow with millions in laundered mob money.

The New Generation of Mafia Children have devised a way to get "protection" money and launder huge sums of dirty money on a corporate level. The big money lobbyists grease the wheels of politicians with the promise of huge campaign donations and fund- raising if their Bill is voted into law. Since there is a limit on campaign donations, they circumvent the law with 527 Political Organizations which are without limits. This is illegal, and in actuality, is another powerful arm of racketeering.


ENTER H$U$




In 1992, the California State Attorney General revoked the Charter of the Humane $ociety of the United $tates for criminal behavior unbecoming a public charity. H$U$ would never be allowed to do business in the state of California again. This action followed a string of fraud, embezzlement, investigation by the SEC, and their well known ties to Underworld figures such as Antonio Giacalone. "Tony Jack", the infamous


head of the Detroit mob is accused of ordering or being involved in the murders of JFK, RFK, MLK as well as Teamsters legend Jimmy Hoffa.

Giacalone and his attorney, DeDay LaRene were convicted for conspiracy and tax evasion and went to prison in 1994. Mob attorney DeDay LaRene' was then paroled in 1995 to The Humane $ociety of the United $tates (H$U$). One has to wonder why a non profit public charity would want or need a brilliant mob attorney working for them? LaRene' lost his Bar license and privilege to practice law in Michigan, but has his license in Maryland.

PHOTO: 
Doris Day - son Terry Melcher

Wills was accused by Sandra LeBost of Royal Oak, Michigan that he never repaid a loan of $28,311 and her father's gold watch worth $10,000. Far from a coincidence, LaRene's wife, Joan Witt, and David Wills VP of the H$U$ were both on the Board of Directors of the Michigan Humane Society. Wills and others were accused of embezzlement when the non profit went under after trying to 
unionize the workers. Wills headed for NSAP, now dormant, for many years before taking the job at HSUS. Joan Witt, DeDay LaRene's wife, followed Wills from her humane society post in Nashua, New Hampshire to MHS, (Maryland Humane Society) where a similar story played out with embezzlement charges thrown at David Wills and the Board. They both then moved onto the HSUS. 

David Wills and Wayne Pacelle once college roommates were friends while Pacelle was with the radical animal rights organization, Fund For Animals. Pacelle then went to work for the H$U$ with Wills in 1994. Soon both were accused of embezzling funds for their flamboyant Mexican wedding. Wills who was being groomed for the top post was charged with embezzlement and left H$U$ leaving a question as to the possibility of Pacelle rolling over on or even setting up Wills, in order to become the next president of H$U$. It is not unusual for the mob to often set up an executive to take the fall for a crime.

Wills married the ex-wife of Alex Pacheco (who helped found PeTA along with Englishwoman, Ingrid Newkirk) and Pacelle married the secretary for Ark Trust, Kristen Rosenberg. Again, it is a mob tactic to marry for power or alliance strengthening so even a short term marriage in order to achieve his goals for H$U$ is not inconceivable. Perhaps it was a way to get H$U$'s foot in the door to do business in California since they were there. It was a known fact that the founder, Gretchen Wyler, had cancer. The plan worked and Ark Trust is now manned by Pacelle and was re-named North Hollywood Office of H$U$. 

One of the most interesting of ever-mounting animal charities being taken over by H$U$ is the Doris Day Animal League. FBI Investigations of drug running/smuggling, and/or mob involvement haunt DDAL. The FBI drug investigation was kept quiet. This information came via a former FBI agent. It wasn't a big leap for DDAL to join organized crime infested H$U$. This merger pretty much says it all for non profits. 

The most intriguing DDAL story is that Doris Day's son, Terry Melcher, who was CEO of DDAL, was not only involved with Charles Manson, the mob, H$U$, and illegal drugs but also with a Satanic cult called 
The Process of which Manson was also a member. The infamous and horrific Sharon Tate murders were committed in Terry Melcher's home by the Manson Family. 

Melcher produced the Byrds, Paul Revere and the Raiders, David Cassidy and as well as the Beach Boys for Columbia Records. The Beach Boys (the Wilson brothers) introduced Melcher to Charlie Manson who was living with them at the time. Manson wanted Melcher to produce his music. Melcher never completed the project which was to include a film of Charlie Manson. Dennis Wilson, Manson's supporter, mysteriously drowned in the Marina del Rey December 28th, 1983. 


Terry Melcher and his girlfriend, Candice Bergen, were living together at 10050 Cielo Drive in Los Angeles where sex and drug orgies were attended by the elite of Hollywood and the music industry. Melcher sub-let to Roman Polanski and Sharon Tate shortly after dropping Manson's project. When the Sharon Tate murders occurred some of the evidence included pornographic and sadistic movies taken of famous guests including Tate. Even John Lennon and George Harrison mentioned staying and doing drugs many times at Melcher's home. The drug connection seems to be the link between all parties with LSD "Orange Sunshine" being the common denominator especially linking the equally gruesome LaBianca murders that occurred days after the Tate murder. Two of the men murdered along with Tate are Jay Sebring, her ex- beau and Hollywood hairdresser who the movie "Shampoo" was supposedly written about and a Polish immigrant, Woytek Frykowski, both who were dealing drugs including "Orange Sunshine LSD".

It was said that Rosemary LaBianca dealt this specific LSD manufactured in Malibu and Laguna Beach and that her husband Leno was deeply involved in the Las Vegas gambling syndicate. Leno was in debt to mobster Frankie Carpo, an associate of the infamous New York Don Frank Costello (that Jack Nicholson portrayed in the movie, The Departed), who Manson served as an apprentice to while doing time in the same prison. Manson had tried to obtain "the black book" that Leno had as well as shake him down for money and without finding the book, savagely killed Leno and his wife. With all the facts at hand, it appears Manson was a hit man. 

After Manson was arrested, Melcher went into intense psychiatric treatment. Melcher was the only witness that was visibly shaking at Manson's trial. Was it from his involvement or fear of Manson?

Doris Day and her son left a wake of murders and suicides following them. Two of Day's three husbands mysteriously committed suicide. These suicides were not investigated. One of them was Melcher's adoptive dad (Terry's biological father was Al Jordan, Day's 1st marriage) who was accused by Day of embezzling her entire $20 Million dollar fortune. Doris Day was not the virginal all American girl that the studios portrayed, but that's another story in itself.

The details of how H$U$ "inherited" the Doris Day Animal League from Terry Melcher who died prematurely from melanoma are murky but suffice it to say, Pacelle was now in control of the biggest name animal organizations in California and the nation. 


BEST FRIENDS - KNUCKLING UNDER TO H$U$ TAKE OVER ?



The founding members of The Process, a satanic worship cult "church" were basically struggling to survive, unable to get sufficient donations to keep their church running upon immigrating from England to the United States. At this time they were in Arizona. The Process had tried Santa Cruz, Los Angeles and San Francisco where they picked up Manson and his followers. Sacrifices of skinned and blood drained dogs followed their every move. This pattern of complaints followed the Process Cult as it moved across the nation. 

There are links to Son of Sam murders and sex/snuff films as well with murders of filmographers and others that trail the several chapters of the Process across the nation.

The founders of the Process Church attended an animal charity fund-raiser in Washington DC and were astounded at how people were throwing money at this 501(c)3 charity. That's when the founding members of The Process realized that it was easier to raise money for animals than for Satan. The founding members returned to Arizona and switched gears. Their organization was re-named BEST FRIENDS, and they moved to Kanab, Utah. 

It seems the "wake" of death and destruction not only follows DDAL but also H$U$ whenever there is about to be the take-over of another "Associate Organization", as Wayne Pacelle calls it. A founder of Best Friends died in an unexplained car accident on his way back to the Best Friends Sanctuary. Best Friends admits that they were The Process Cult Church that sacrificed pets, but it's a little different when they themselves are up for sacrifice. The Founding Members never counted on they themselves being murdered if they objected to take- over or "changing of the guard" as was stated to this writer in 2008 before "The Recent Accident" by one of the original founding members. Who knew Ernst Paul Eckhoff, 72, of Kanab would be dead in a few months in a mysterious single car (?) roll-over accident! 

PHOTO: 
Charlie Manson 1969 said to be a member of Process Church

It is rumored that a rendering plant was built nearby the Best Friends "Sanctuary" to dispose of the animals. It certainly could help keep things tidy after a bloody sacrifice. 

For those that are inclined to dismiss The Process' involvement in these crimes, consider the fact that the night before Robert F. Kennedy was killed, RFK accompanied Sharon Tate and Roman Polanski to a dinner party at the Malibu home of John Frankenheimer, the Director of the movie, The Manchurian Candidate. After the party, Frankenheimer then drove Kennedy back to the Ambassador Hotel. His assassin, Sirhan Sirhan, had visited a member of The Process that worked in the kitchen at the Ambassador Hotel the day before where Kennedy was gunned down. Kennedy was the most courageous and committed Attorney General this nation has ever had when it came to fighting organized crime. 


H$U$ - Humane $ociety of the United $tates



A little known fact is that Wayne Pacelle's brother, Richard Jr, is a professor at Georgia Southern University and teaches Non Profit Law. Could it be that he is the brains behind his brother's strategy and criminal career at H$U$ by using the law to circumvent the existing law.

Richard Pacelle's specialty is teaching Non Profit Law. Wife Fenton Strickland is the head of the research collection in Political Science at Indiana University 

Pictured right are wife Fenton Strickland, Mom Pat Pacelle, Richard Pacelle Jr

"The Pacelle Family name is spelled Pacelli" 

"Pacelle appears to have been Pacelli when the family arrived in the United States.." 

"My life is pretty much like a cross between "My Big Fat Greek Wedding" and "The Soprano's"."

The quotes above are from Richard Pacelle, Jr.'s website. Richard equates his family to the "Sopranos"?


When a reporter mispronounced Wayne's name, ballistic comes to mind regarding Wayne's reaction. Why? Could it be the ties to the organized crime underworld? Upon reviewing Wayne Pacelli's Family Tree one finds some very interesting characters not only from the "Old Country Italy" but from Al Capone's infamous St. Valentine's Day Massacre. The man credited with the planning and orchestration of the St Valentine's Massacre was William Pacelli, right hand man for Capone. William Pacelli was also elected three times as Chicago representative for the state of Illinois. Was this Uncle Bill from the St. Valentine's Massacre credited with planning the gruesome crime that shocked America?

Other well known Mob names are laced throughout the Wayne Pacelli Family Tree also. Maselli sometimes spelled Masselli, like those in the New Jersey and Rhode Island Crime Families pops up often. In an article in Time Magazine, William Masselli is described by the FBI as a "self-admitted soldier" in the Genovese Mafia family.

The Pacelle brothers are not to be underestimated for their criminal genius. Wayne not only sits on the Board of many non-profits but he and his other H$U$ Board members and longtime "associates" also own or sit on the Boards of many of the for profit corporations. The for profit corporations service H$U$ such as the marketing mail houses that receive millions each year from H$U$ to solicit via the US Postal Service for donations. as well as lockbox corporations that receive the actual donations (envelope openers). These donations are then used to pay these service companies and salaries of H$U$ personnel with only 4% of the total income for H$U$ going to help animals in any direct way.

Before Pacelle took the helm of H$U$, the reported income was nearly $2 million dollars annually. Now they report over $100 million in income per year. What charity has ever made this kind of a leap in history? H$U$ paid over $881,000 to Exciting New Technologies, owned by the main internet support service for on-line pornography and internet gambling. Ex H$U$ president Dr. Irwin's son, Chris, was hired as Director of Business Development by the owner of ENT, Gordon, a mail and bank fraud felon. Dr. Irwin moved to the position of CEO of the American Bible Society, where $5 million went to ENT within two years time. Once the pornographic background was revealed, Irwin was dismissed from his post by a very embarrassed American Bible Society.


THE BLACK EGG




Singer writes in his paper, 
Heavy Petting,"Some men use hens as a sexual object, inserting their penis into the cloaca, an all-purpose channel for wastes and for the passage of the egg. This is usually fatal to the hen, and in some cases she will be deliberately decapitated just before ejaculation in order to intensify the convulsions of its sphincter."This is cruelty, clear and simple. (But is it worse for the hen than living for a year or more crowded with four or five other hens in barren wire cage so small that they can never stretch their wings, and then being stuffed into crates to be taken to the slaughterhouse, strung upside down on a conveyor belt and killed? If not, then it is no worse than what egg producers do to their hens all the time.)"


Photo: Peter Singer - by Joel Travis Sage

Pacelle showed up uninvited and unannounced, at a Pacific North West Egg Producer Convention prior to the filing of the California initiative later to be called "Prop 2". Wayne Pacelle made them an offer, off the record, which in this case they refused.

The use of classic mob tactics which encompasses fear, threat, intimidation and extortion (racketeering) are exactly what was employed against the egg producers by refusing to "play ball" with Pacelle. H$U$ promptly financed the Initiative for "hen welfare" in California. The implementation of Prop 2, , will put egg producers out of business and devastate the agricultural industry in California. Beef, pork and dairy producers will soon join the egg producers' exodus from California. This is reminiscent of the space industry's exodus and the "depression" that followed in California.

Next, Neil Trent animal rights extremist and CEO of HSI (Humane $ociety International) was placed as Director of the Marin Humane $ociety just before Prop 2. Neil Trent's timely appearance pushed out a very competent shelter director who had run the Marin Humane Society for 20 years. Soon Neil Trent now as Director of The Marin Humane Society was speaking in support for Prop 2. Why would he leave a position at the top of H$I to run a small time local humane society. 

Was Neil Trent "placed" in this liberal wealthy California locale in order to garner support and financing for Prop 2? Neil Trent abruptly left the Marin Humane Society shortly after Prop 2 was passed. 

Another strategic placement happened at the prestigious San Francisco SPCA. It's new Director from Colorado, a hotbed for punitive animal legislation, Jan McHugh-Smith played hostess to the Prop 2 rallies held by Wayne Pacelle himself. Wayne Pacelle and Neil Trent (
Pacelle's Capo) were side by side at the rally in Marin County. Pacelle said in the moment of excitement after three hours of mind- control dribble, "Are you inspired by your Co- Religionists? " Pacelle and Neil Trent were leading an apparent revival meeting soliciting members for Pacelle's "1000 Club". Planted "ringers" in the audience much like at corrupt auction house would jump up and shout "I'll get a thousand signatures". This club is for those who obtained 1000 plus signatures to get the Prop 2 initiative on the ballot in California to overthrow free enterprise for farmers and ranchers. Wayne said over and over in a monotone hypnotic voice, "hens in barren wire cages so small that they can never stretch their wings, or turn around" for three hours. 
Prop 2 passed by uninformed voters in CA not realizing that the price of eggs would double before Prop 2 was in place and may very well quadruple the price of eggs before January 1, 2015. But that was only phase one. The most important piece of the puzzle for control of the food production of California was yet to drop.

AB 1437, the Shelled EGG Bill, was sponsored by Jared Huffman, a first-time Democrat Assembly member from Mill Valley (Marin County) during the present legislative session (2009). There are no egg growers in Mill Valley nor Marin County. Why is Huffman sponsoring this Bill? Huffman claims it is for "hen welfare". Seemingly, legislators have forgotten about the welfare of their constituency, the consumer. There is no other food product that is used more than eggs. The reasons it affects the price of food more than any other animal food product is because there are eggs in almost all processed foods, such as baked goods, crackers, cookies, pancake mix, and in frozen prepared foods as emulsifiers and stabilizers as well as to boost the nutritional content of foods. 

After an examination of campaign donations to the Prop 2 campaign organization, Californians For Humane Farms by the Fair Political Practices Commission, it was advised that the donations represented 
RICO activity and should be investigated by the Attorney General's Office. 

H$U$ has found a way to bypass the campaign donation limitations by laundering the money through employees of H$U$and it's "Associate Member Organizations". H$U$'s 501(c)3 non profit "loaned" $500,000 to DDAL a 501(c)4 organization, (whom they own) to lobby Prop 2 in California which goes into effect in 2015. The 501(c)3 organizations are forbidden to "loan" or "give" money to 527 organizations by the IRS and under the Fair Political Practices Act. This has been reported repeatedly but is ignored not only by the IRS but by the Attorney General of the State of California. When a Senator's staff was asked why no investigation was ongoing, the response was "Jerry Brown is running for Governor. He won't be making waves." 

However, Jerry Brown, a dyed in the wool Democrat, also looked the other way during the Katrina disaster, when a multitude of complaints were levied against H$U$ for misappropriating the $35 million in direct donations intended for hurricane victims. Yet, Brown did prosecute a smaller charity, Noah's Wish, that received $8 million in Katrina donations which were seized by Brown. What is also missing are the pets supposedly "rescued."

What the above persons and organizations will eventually find out is that they were set up and used by Pacelle at H$U$ to commit crimes for him and the furtherance of organized crime and his future "political" career. The end result will be a black market that drives the price of eggs through the roof, loss of jobs, businesses and tax revenues for the state at a time when California is teetering at the precipice of bankruptcy.

Prop 2 enables H$U$ to not only inspect but raid anyone involved in animal production agriculture in California. If H$U$ finds animal cruelty, the H$U$ is allowed to seize, keep, sell anything they steal from California's farmers as well as heavily fine farmers and send farmers to prison. H$U$ wants to do away with the California Department of Agriculture and take their place. For this end, Pacelle is pulling the strings of the 2nd most powerful Senator in the State Legislature, Dean Florez. California's Dept. of Agriculture is probably the only agency running in the black in California. This is the conduit for "protection money" to flow to H$U$. What better way for organized crime to operate than through a non profit within the state structure. It would never be audited by the IRS. The perks are, the H$U$ appointed criminals, many of whom are felons, can legally carry guns and shoot anyone they'd like to remove. They can steal, keep, sell and profit from all the farmers they want to put out of business. What are California Legislators thinking putting VEGANS armed with weapons in charge of MEAT and EGG GROWERS? 

The California legislators are NOT thinking. They are being bribed. A bribe is not just money, it is anything that is promised or accepted in order to obtain a vote on a Bill or Law that the briber can profit from and the legislator receives some advantage which can be sex, a sweater (as in US v Frega of San Diego) the promise of a Campaign Donation. It is also 
Racketeering. Former Judge Adams is still in Lompoc Federal Prison, just ask him.

It's not just H$U$ that is bribing and running a racketeering scheme and artifice, they are dragging other non profits into their bloody corrupt pit. H$U$ donated $10,000 to Judi Mancuso's 501(c)3 group called $ocial Compassion that has been leading the attack against pet owners to fine and seize any and all pets not sterilized. Again, shadows of the Nazi horrors. 
Judi Mancuso then turned around and gave the entire $10,000 to Senator Majority Leader Darrell Steinberg's 527 campaign organization. It is illegal for Social Compassion to donate money to a 527. Now, Mancuso and other organizations are staging to wage a war on farmers with groups like Animal Cruelty Investigators, a rogue SPCA whose main board member, the husband of longtime PeTA employee, Jane Garrison, is partners with Mancuso's husband, Rolf Wicklund, a cousin of the notorious ALF spokesperson and admitted operative, Freeman Wicklund. Freeman Wicklund also headed the radical organization, COKS, and then not so coincidentally, Mercy For Animals, that set up a Fresno chicken farmer for a faked undercover expose on chicken abuse during the Prop 2 campaign. 


California State Legislature Votes To Pay H$U$ Protection Money




If by now, you are wondering how is it conceivably legal to seize a citizen's property under such quasi guidelines as a chicken being able to stretch their wings, the answer is corruption within the legislature. 

Pictured right is Louis Caldera 

Since 1993 citizens in the state of California have begged the Attorney General, the local District Attorneys and Law Enforcement to investigate the illegal issuance of search and seizure warrants by Superior Court Judges to private, non profit 501(c)3 corporations. 

These warrants are issued to SPCA and Humane Societies to do Home Invasion Robberies and file false fabricated criminal charges against property owners to, bottom line, be awarded large "restitution orders" from the Judge. The Judge automatically signs a criminal Abstract of Judgment for from $250,000 to $850,000. This then enables the Non Profit Private Corporation to lien and force sale or seize the home or property.

The 
California Constitution Article 2, Section 12 specifically states that "The Legislature Shall Not Give Any Power To A Private Person or Private Corporation". 

The State of California Legislature violated the California Constitution in 1995 with 607f of the Civil Code. When caught, Assemblymember Louis Caldera had it repealed in 1996. * Seems scandal follows the former California Assemblymember.

Caldera was appointed by President Obama as Director of the Military January 9, 2009. He resigned May 22 after accepting responsibility as the scapegoat for the Air Force One fly over scandal in New York that left many New Yorkers in a state of terror and panic. 


In 1997, the president, of spca/LA, Madeline Bernstein, became outraged with Caldera and wrote a scathing but self-incriminating letter* to Caldera admitting that "she had even written the Humane Officer Bill and did everything Bernstein and Caldera had agreed on in order for Caldera to put this law in place." (Employees and volunteers for 501(c)3's are not to be involved in the political process at all or they lose their non profit status, as per IRS code)

Bernstein represented about 30 other non profit SPCA/Humane Societies that would benefit from this law allowing them to be able to seize property and homes for their profit to make their non profits wealthy. This also made them eligible to collect monthly from city and county government and the State Mandate Fund which would give them up to one million dollars for convicting or getting "plea bargains" from persons charged with animal cruelty. This would allow for six digit salaries for the executives of these non profits such as Bernstein who is paid over $200,000 to seize and kill thousands of loved pets a year taken from loving homes under fraudulent cruelty charges. (See D & D Disposal annual report)

In February 1997, Bernstein went to work finding a new "termed out" old Senator that didn't care about what he was doing to his constituents or the rest of California. Bernstein found the perfect patsy, Senator Ayala. Ayala already had SB 633, The Water Bill, a 100 page monster, on the floor that he sponsored. Bernstein was in hot pursuit of Ayala to ramrod her "Humane Officer Bill"* through the Senate hidden on the last few pages of his Water Bill.

California Constitution Article 4, Section 9 prohibits sneaking attachments onto Bills that are not the same subject matter in the title and content into bills that are already presented to the House or Senate. Anything added "shall" be the same as the Title of the Bill. The Water Bill,* as it is titled, addresses water companies and their corporate responsibilities. Article 4, Section 9* specifically states that ANY Bill or subject matter that is added to an existing Bill and passed into law is VOID and shall not be enforced.

CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION ARTICLE 4,SEC. 9 
A statute shall embrace but one subject, which shall beexpressed in its title. If a statute embraces a subject not expressed in its title, only the part not expressed is VOID.
 

Bernstein and Ayala managed to not only SNEAK the Humane Officer Bill attachment into SB 633, but they got it passed and placed into the Corporate Code 14500 through 14503 and into effect in October 1997. 
Corporate Codes 14500 through 14503 are Constitutionally Void in the state of California. The Attorney Generals including Jerry Brown, have ignored all complaints and pleas from the citizens of the State of California to investigate theSPCA/Humane Society's illegal Home Invasion Robberies, beatings of senior citizens, carrying and use of spca/LA's automatic weapons. 

In late 2008 a disabled LAPD officer's mother died of a stroke from one of Bernstein's Home Invasion Robberies after being terrorized by Madeline Bernstein and Los Angeles Assistant City Attorney Donald Cocek.

This is not just murder, it is pre-meditated murder. How many more "deaths of senior citizens" is it going to take for the state of California legislature and the Attorney General's Office to wake up?


January 10th, 2007 Madeline Bernstein and her thugs, Steven Pacheco and Derek Hensel from Pasadena Humane Society, Tony Manzanares and 11 others, beat a 57 year old woman to the floor of her home, bashed her head against a bookcase for at least two minutes over and over, Pacheco shoved a 9mm between her eyes, as Hensel pointed an automatic weapon with a grenade launcher at her. Manzanares threatened to tazer her, then knocked her to the floor . Manzanares and Hensel grabbed her by the breasts and arms and dragged her out of her home. Another man, David Havard, grabbed her by the breasts and held her that way against a retaining wall outside for over a half hour sexually touching her. 

Madeline Berstein directs her thugs and is responsible for these actions. She is a licensed attorney in NY and CA and according to law "knew or should have known" she was committing the following felonies against the State of CA as well as all of her victims in Home Invasion Robberies by violating the following:

CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION ARTICLE 4, SEC. 15 
A person who seeks to influence the vote or action of a member of the Legislature in the member's legislative capacity by bribery, promise of reward, intimidation, or other dishonest means, or a member of the Legislature so influenced, is guilty of a felony."
 

We obtained copies of her letters to Caldera.

One cannot imagine why the Dept of Justice is not investigating these travesties. 

Al "Scarface" Capone would be proud.


The Mob, H$U$ and the Black Egg Copyright 8/17/2009


EDITOR'S NOTE. . .



This special note is to Roger Kindler, legal counsel for H$U$. 


At one time you sent me what is basically called a "cease and desist" from publishing factual information regarding the criminality of H$U$. You sent it certified and registered via the U.S. mail. It took you three (3) pages of type, I still have the copy. I replied in kind with 3 sentences. Basically I told you to pack your brief case's if you plan on suing me.

How do you like me now?

Sincerely, 

Fred Crane 
Editor 
Game Fowl News


Disclaimer


This site (NationalDogPress) does not advocate or endorse any activities that are in violation of Federal, State, or Local laws.


Title 17 U.S.C. section 107


In compliance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, GFN is distributed free, without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

All logos and trademarks in this site (NationalDogPress) are property of their respective owner.

NATIONAL DOG PRESS - FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.


 

NEWS SOURCE:

email: gfn@nethere.com

phone: 202-506-9008

web: http://www.gamefowlnews.com

###

 Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit)


"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."


PLEASE DONATE to Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) BY CLICKING ON THE PAYPAL LINK BELOW: 

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=6721925

Fair Use Notice:
 Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
Legal Disclaimer:
  The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.
 
Copyright © 2006-2010,  Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) Iowa 2009, NationalDogPress News, All Rights Reserved
 

 

Posted by Dean A. Ayers, Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom on 12/19/2009 at 05:55 AM in HSUSHumane Society ScamINSANITY in SocietyThe HSUS, the MOB, and the Black EGG | Permalink | Comments (2) |TrackBack (0)

Digg This | Save to del.icio.us

Humane Society of the United States claim they are training law enforcement

Does anyone know anything about these HSUS animal rights agenda training camps?

Humane Society of the United States claim they are training law enforcement

 By Dean A. Ayers  Monday, December 21, 2009

QUESTION: Does anyone know anything about these HSUS animal rights agenda cop training camps? No one is publicly preaching or teaching about this agenda.  The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) proudly claims they “are” training law enforcement to shut down animal breeders.

ANSWER: HSUS has documented law enforcement animal rights agenda accomplishments in 2008: Here are the HSUS quotes on these training camp accomplishments as follows;

  • The newly established Humane Society Legislative Fund began lobbying on Capitol Hill to secure legislation, support animal friendly Congressional candidates for office, and educate the public.
  • We also helped prosecutors win the conviction of scores of animal abusers and animal fighters — assisting with cases involving dog fighting, hoarding, farm animal abuse, and puppy mills. We created a new HSUS Animal Protection Litigation (APL) SWAT team consisting of 12 full-time attorneys and recruited hundreds of pro bono lawyers.
  • More than 57,700 law enforcement officers, educators, shelter professionals, emergency services personnel and veterinarians attended HSUS training andeducation classes.

The only cure for “puppy mill” legislation proposal propaganda is a large dose of the truth.

HSUS has previously claimed Pennsylvania was the “puppy mill” capitol of the USA. Now it seems that Ohio is the puppy mill capitol. Or is it Arizona? Or Colorado? Or Iowa? Or Illinois? As a result of these unfounded “puppy mill” capitol claims, legislators are clamoring to erase any stigma of being potentially labeled the “puppy mill” capitol of the USA, affecting their state’s good name. But they cannot all be the “puppy mill” capitol can they?

The key to resolving this problem and question, like so many issues, is education. Legislators want to do the right thing. They rely on constituents to tell them what problems are occurring in their districts. In the absence of good information, a slick propaganda campaign like the HSUS puppy mill effort can really take hold in many states, especially when the HSUS admittedly are sending law enforcement to their “animal rights” education training camps for alleged re-education on the animal rights side of the agenda. And what is even scarier, is that various law enforcements agencies are allegedly accepting these “training camp” education invitations to be allegedly re-educated on animal issues.

What is clear is that numerous legislators “wanting to do the right thing” for their state’s citizens in these alleged or suspected “puppy mill” states.  The legislators allegedly disclose they are not aware that they are being deceived by the animal rights groups.

In press releases by the state legislators authoring the various puppy mill bills, many express shock at discovering that their state is the “puppy mill” capitol of the U.S.

But they cannot all be the “puppy mill” capitols can they, as animal rights activists want you to believe in their aggressive “puppy mill” reaching campaigns in many states. Just like one such aggressive “puppy mill” disclosure agenda in Iowa, by Mary LaHay, allegedly campaigning in the state of Iowa for her IowaVCA agenda.

 

So who is Rights or Wrong on “puppy mill” state’s statistics?

We the People, who love, care, control, and observe our dogs, and other owner’s dogs (or dog kennel businesses) daily, must ask our ourselves, and then ask our representatives and senators to verify the claims of kennel abuses before believing that their state is a haven for abusive “puppy mill” kennels.

Pro sportsmen in each state must ask their legislators to make sure that these “puppy mill” proposal bills do not impact small kennels that may sell only a few dogs in a proper and legitimate love, and caring, home, and animal welfare environment, as they primarily exist for hunting, field trials, hobbies, etc.

Elected officials must be told by We the People, that we are not the source of pet store dog purchases. There by preventing confusion in your comments and legislative proposal requests sent to your legislators, who are now treating private dog kennels the same as large scaled commercial “puppy mill” entities.

These USDA and large scale dog kennels allegedly containing hundreds or thousands of poor helpless and defenseless dogs, being “factory farmed” in relentless abusive breeding techniques and conditions, that will ultimately result in the elimination of the small scale legitimate home breeders and the sporting dog kennels who actually do care about the love for dog(s), and the proper and responssible animal welfare of their dogs and puppies.

When the people in each state contact their senators and representatives, they are not always told this “truthful” information I describe in this article. Rather generalizations and a stereotype of “puppy mills” is instead portrayed to the legislators. This is very damaging to responsible small scale dog breeders and to private property dog owners at best. It is just plain evil at worst.

Most legislators must also contend with behind the scenes issues, like the alleged dog kennel or animal rights lobbying in attempting to curb the legislators on the animal rights or animal welfare issues, depending on which side you campaign for.

In reaction the legislators want to make sure they (the legislators) are not over-reaching in new animal laws or they take the “extreme” measure and pass “anything goes” in good or bad animal laws for dog and animal owners, let alone dog breeders.

Many legislators have been open to animal legislation changes protecting smaller private property pets, small scale sporting dogs or small independent family controlled dog kennels. You just don’t know how the legislators are going to react.

The burden is on us to make sure they know the truth. Additionally, it is important the We the People communicate our concerns also to our local animal shelter, animal rescues, and animal control authorities, as to the “truth” in our information, as it is obvious now, that the HSUS, has a proactive agenda to radically influence all law enforcement authorities in their animal rights activists agendas.

 

CFP Tools

Bookmark and Share 

(0) Reader Feedback | Subscribe | Print friendly | E-mail a friend | Contact Us 

Author
Dean A. Ayers  Bio
Dean A. Ayers Most recent columns

Dean A. Ayers is the Lead Investigative Reporter forNationalDogPress

Original Article Link:

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/18156

ANIMALS C.L.U.B.- FREEDOM National Organization Incorporated (Nonprofit)

Posted December 6, 2009




ANIMALS C.L.U.B.- FREEDOM National Organization Incorporated (Nonprofit)


A "Nonprofit" National C.L.U.B. and Animal Protection Organization to Protect Pet Owners.


Welcome to our National Organization known as Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom.

We the People, of this National "Nonprofit" Organization, want to express our appreciation to you for taking an "active"interest in preserving "your" rights to freely own your "pets"and "animals" without intrusion by the government, individuals, or "animal rights activist" groups or other organizations, who’s sole mission are to "eliminate" and "destroy" our freedom, liberty, and American way of life, with our pets and animals on our own private property as extended members of our families.

Laws are only words written on paper, words that change on society’s whim, and are interpreted differently daily by politicians, lawyers, judges, and policemen. We cannot by total reliance on law; escape our "duty" to judge right and wrong, and take "action" to stop the tyranny at "Freedom's Gate." For a person's religion is not worth it’s salt, if the animals and pets are not the better for it.

Dean A. Ayers, (Prior) Special Agent, AFOSI, U.S.A.F., United States of America.

"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."

http://AnimalsClubFreedom.org/

Please visit daily our National Organization's Official Article Publishers at the links below, with over 50 total articles on Dog Law, Pet Owners, Animal Welfare, Dogs, Pets, and Animal Articles affecting every Pet Owner in the USA and Canada. 

Just CLICK on the 3 links below for separate articles numbering in excess of 50 articles to date in total.


Visit our many nationally published pet and animal articles and postings at the following links. 

Then be sure to come back and read the rest of this web site's pages and articles as well.


http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/members/16235/Dean%20A.%20Ayers/

and

http://www.associatedcontent.com/user/583274/dean_a_ayers.html

and

http://www.AnimalsClubFreedom.typepad.com/

A "Nonprofit" National C.L.U.B. and Animal Protection Organization to Protect Pet Owners

Posted November 1, 2009



A "Nonprofit" National C.L.U.B. and Animal Protection Organization to Protect Pet Owners.

Welcome to our National Organization known as Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom.

We the People, of this National "Nonprofit" Organization, want to express our appreciation to you for taking an "active"interest in preserving "your" rights to freely own your "pets"and "animals" without intrusion by the government, individuals, or "animal rights activist" groups or other organizations, who’s sole mission are to "eliminate" and "destroy" our freedom, liberty, and American way of life, with our pets and animals on our own private property as extended members of our families.

Laws are only words written on paper, words that change on society’s whim, and are interpreted differently daily by politicians, lawyers, judges, and policemen. We cannot by total reliance on law; escape our "duty" to judge right and wrong, and take "action" to stop the tyranny at "Freedom's Gate." For a person's religion is not worth it’s salt, if the animals and pets are not the better for it.

Dean A. Ayers, (Prior) Special Agent, AFOSI, U.S.A.F., United States of America.

"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."



Please visit daily our National Organization's Official Article Publishers at the links below, with over 50 total articles on Dog Law, Pet Owners, Animal Welfare, Dogs, Pets, and Animal Articles affecting every pet Owner
in the USA and Canada.

Just CLICK on the 3 links below for separate articles numbering in excess of 50 articles to date in total.

Visit our many nationally published pet and animal articles
and postings at the following links. Then be sure to come
back and read the rest of this web site's pages and articles as well.


hhttp://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/members/16235/Dean%20A.%20Ayers/

and

hhttp://www.associatedcontent.com/user/583274/dean_a_ayers.html

and

http://www.AnimalsClubFreedom.typepad.com/

Animal control laws and officers challenge your right to dog ownership

Posted October 4, 2009



Original Article Links:

http://animalsclubfreedom.typepad.com/

and

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/15426


Animal control laws and officers challenge your right to dog ownership

Animal laws that limit the number of animals allowed in a household or vaguely define a “bad smell” in the pet owner’s home are intended to make it easier to prosecute individuals.


By Dean A. Ayers

Lead Investigative Reporter

NationalDogPress ©

4 Oct. 09


Many dog owners in recent years have faced the unthinkable; a knock at their door that has heralded the arrival of an Animal Control officer with a complaint about your dog(s). In some cases that visit has been concluded satisfactorily to both the dog owner and the animal control officer; in others it has meant the heartache of either seizure of the owner’s dog(s) and/or facing stiff fines for various reasons in an abuse, neglect, or number limit citation.

With animal ownership laws now undergoing radical evolving changes throughout the country, the result is now a ‘perverted’ evolving animal “activist” produced animal care and control law now being used. Animal rights ‘extremists' some of which are in fact, animal control officers, and others working in animal rights group legislation lobbies are the new means for dog owner 'harassment.' The constant upgrade of these radical ‘animal controlling’ laws drastically increases the ‘real’ possibility of a visit to your door on your own private property from Animal Control Authorities becoming ever more of a specter to haunt you and also every dog owner in the nation.

Specifically targeted by legislation ‘activists’ are creating the laws that 'limit' the number of dogs, cats, pets, and animals allowed in a household (by an unsubstantiated arbitrary pet ‘limit’ number) which is intended to make it easier to prosecute individuals who are thought to have "too many," according to this arbitrary standard put into the animal law. Even more sinister is that these ‘activist’ pushed animal laws are also applied even to those people who are not in violation of health, nuisance and humane laws.

These dog or animal "number limit" laws are now being joined by various other anti-pet ownership restrictive laws, such as mandatory breeder permits and licensing requirements (being pursued for example at this time in Iowa legislation) for even a single one time litter of any dog and the owner is now faced with major state intrusive inspections for a kennel or breeder license for having more than 3 pets in the home, or having a single litter of puppies. All of this being “PAINTED” as the need to stop alleged puppy mills, which of course in most instances is “bull”. Other totally vague animal control laws that can threaten responsible dog owners who are not in any kind of notable breeding or kenneling business are those ‘activist’ lobbied animal laws that allow the animal control officer to ‘define’ the offense of “BAD SMELL” in the home as a violation in animal control care and control laws. Many good and loving pet owners whose dogs are well cared for and kept as their extended family members are suddenly in violation of an animal control officers “definition of “BAD SMELL” in the home, based upon the pets living in their homes, rather than caged outside alone and exposed to the climate, like a beast.

Why, there are many people, who object to a ‘single turd’ in a field that can be smelled downwind from 3 miles away, and object to that smell as a “BAD SMELL” under animal law or other people who are obsessed, compelled or driven to use massive amounts of dangerous cleaning products (by the liter or gallon) in a home (that are dangerous to the health of the animals and humans alike)to kill any and all ‘bad’ smells; so take into account an ‘activist’ animal control officer, who is this described ‘clean freak’ inspecting pet owner homes, using this vague and intrusive animal law as a criminal, abusive, or neglectful animal law violation according to their ‘definition of a ‘BAD SMELL’ in the pet owners home.

This vague and intrusive ‘unbalanced’ definition of tyranny control in the animal law begs for fees, fines, confiscations, seizures, and ultimate adoption or euthanasia of properly maintained pet owner animals in their home. Tyranny at its core to allow an ‘activist’ animal control officer to ‘harass’ and ‘intimidate’ virtually any pet owner in their jurisdiction, based solely upon a “BAD SMELL?” Please! These ‘activist’ animal laws have completely gone over the edge of the cliff in dealing in ‘reality’ and ‘common sense’.

'Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom' National Organization Incorporated (Nonprofit) is actively opposing all restrictive legislation limiting the responsible pet ownership of all dogs, cats, and other pets. Unfortunately some 'perverted' anti-pet ownership laws have still made their way onto the books. Just take a look at the 94 + page anti-pet ordinance of Louisville, KY by its Metro council, or the tyranny animal control laws with a three strike violation rule, taking away any right to owning any pet or animal in Omaha, Nebraska, or the 3-strike violation rule in Mills County, Iowa if your little 'fluffy' is caught off your private property 3 times. Your little "Fluffy" will be declared a "dangerous dog" according to their animal care and control ordinance for the county. How’s that for success in animal control laws stopping animal crimes in the midst of a rural county? These ‘activist’ based and promoted animal tyranny laws are occurring all across the nation as we speak. Ever more intrusive and controlling by the day.

For all dog owners, do we need reminded that it is important to promote the need for responsible freedom in the care and ownership of your dog(s) and pets in order to prevent tyranny from overcoming common sense in dog ownership matters? Or is it going to take a ‘knock at your door’ and an unlawful dog confiscation without any ‘due process’ for the dog owner to open your eyes to the truth in animal law "tyranny" now days?


Breeding even a single dog litter is now the ‘target’ of license laws

There is great value to society in the historic preservation of all our pet ownership of our chosen dog breeds as extended members of our family, and in the selective, planned breeding of our pets, for desirable and predictable traits in our chosen and favored dog breeds as well.

Claims that the organized dog fancy or local backyard hobby dog breeders contributes to the problem of homeless dogs in shelters cannot be supported by any alleged evidence from any Animal Rights activist groups, such as PETA, ELF, ALF, HSUS, ASPCA or any local humane society through facts that are real, not manufactured like liberal propaganda.

Above all else, dog owners, backyard dog hobbyists and dog fanciers must all become aware of the animal control laws in their own locale, and must also be aware of their 'rights' if faced with that ‘intrusive’ visit from an Animal Control Officer or Law Enforcement Officer regarding your pets and animals, and their ability to ‘harass’ you with vague and ‘interpretive’ definitions of the animal laws.

It is necessary for all dog and pet owners to be familiar with all animal identification regulations for your dogs in your locale, as the future to continued further 'restrictive' local, county, state, or federal animal care, control, or identification regulations are potentially, only a 'stroke of the pen' away from being amended to include identification of many non-farm related pets and animals to be further controlled and cared for by government laws, due to any potential future transmission of a communicable animal disease in dogs or other pets or animals that may arise.

At that time, you and your dogs, and animals will then have to deal with Federal, State, and local animal control regulations on your private property, called a premises. Not only will you have a real possibility of 'animal control' showing up with restrictive regulations and ordinances of your dogs and your ownership freedom, but you will also have to deal with the 'dog-ma' of inspector police from the USDA animal and agriculture authorities or your state controlled 'dog-cops' checking your animals on your private property premises as well.

ALWAYS, Always, always, educate yourself and learn your animal control laws for your area and 'stand your ground' in knowing your 'rights' in responsible dog ownership. Always insure you have a name, and contact number for an Attorney at Law that is familiar with ‘Animal Law” in order to represent you and your dogs, not if, but when, the ‘activists’ in animal control come knocking at your door.

Remember when it comes to freely owning your dogs, pets and animals in an area frequented by Animal Rights Activists or Animal Control, "The truth is rarely pure and never simple."

NationalDogPress ©


Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit)

"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."


PLEASE DONATE to Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) BY CLICKING ON THE PAYPAL LINK BELOW:

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=6721925

Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Legal Disclaimer: The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.

Copyright © 2006-2009, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) Iowa 2009, NationalDogPress News, All Rights Reserved

Posted by Dean A. Ayers, Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom on 10/04/2009 at 12:49 PM in "Due Process" Before Animal Control Takes Your Dog, A Chicken Lesson for Dog Owners, Animal Control, Animal Control Officers, Bad Smelling Pets, Books, C.L.U.B. QUOTE, Current Affairs, Dog and Human Euthanasia Unethical, Dog Insurance Requirements, Dog Law, Dog License Tyranny, Dog Ordinance Tyranny, Dog Rescue Action Needed, Dogs, Pets, and Animals, Due Process in Animal Laws, Film, Flaming Liberal Swords, Food and Drink, Freedom and Happiness, Games, GlenwoodIowa.org, Health Care, HEALTH CARE ALERT, Humane Health Care?, Humane Society Scam, INSANITY in Society, Life's Troubles, Mills County, Iowa, Music, NAIS Animal ID, NationalDogPress Newsletter, Nebraska Humane Society - NOT!, No Dogs in Canada and the USA , Our Nation Won't Survive, Pet Food, PETA DEATH CAMPS, Private Property Intrusion, Religion, RFID Chips, Sarah Palin , Sarah Palin HELP!, Science, Socialist America, Sports, Swine Flu Fraud?, Television, Thank You!, Travel, Web/Tech, Weblogs

Your Pet Belongs to You, Not the Government

Posted August 14, 2009
Dog Licensing Is An Outrage

Your Pet Belongs to You, Not the Government

by Dean A. Ayers


The erosion of our freedom to own dogs, pets and animals, rings true of the current political climate in the USA Today. We the People who own dogs, cats, pets and animals are especially struck by the public’s statements concerning agreement or apathy towards all the various government licensing to include that of our pets and animals.

Definition of Licensing and the Misconceptions:

Most people seem to believe that a dog or pet license is a freedom, when in true fact, it is a taking.

A license is a temporary, revocable permit issued by government that allows the holder to have something or to do something that is otherwise illegal. For example, in the USA the licensing of firearms has virtually removed our Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.

Any time a license is issued, a freedom is jeopardized. By the very act of licensing dogs, the act of owning or even possessing a dog has been made illegal.

Animals are traditional property, now legally having “Intrinsic Value:”

Animals are human-kind's most ancient and traditional property. Before ever we settled down to a plot of land and threw seeds in the soil, we numbered animals as our most valuable possessions. Wealth has always been associated with the number of animals that a person owned, and kept.

Now animal ownership, use, and the ancient, honorable practice of animal husbandry are under global attack by dog laws, animal ID laws globally. It was initiated by the animal "rights" movement, and adapted by local, state, and federal governments throughout the world.


A Dog's life has 'intrinsic value,' New York judge finds:

Finding that a dog "is somewhere between a person and personal property," a New York trial court said a pet owner whose dog died following unauthorized surgery may seek damages beyond the purchase price of the animal. "[A dog] is not an inanimate thing that just receives affection; it also returns it," the court wrote, citing Corso v. Crawford, 97 Misc. 2d 530 (N.Y., Queens County Civ. Ct. 1979).

Doing Away with Dog Ownership:

All the dog legislation, animal control laws, dog ownership licensing, animal breeder licensing and animal ID programs will effectively do away with all but the largest commercial breeders and providers. When the small traditional owner and holder have been the basis for our animals and economy world-wide, it soon will end with all animals owned being controlled through licensing of many types and behaviors, as well as the food we all eat for life will be controlled by the seed products being copyrighted thru large commercial concerns like Monsanto, and those of us who have traditionally grown our own food or owned animals personally for various reasons will be locked out or the owners will be locked up literally, also known as “Jail” or animal shelters, etc.

Read the rest of the article

http://animalsclubfreedom.typepad.com/animals-club--freedom-national-org-inc-non-profit/2009/07/the-licensing-of-tyranny-in-dog-ownership.html

Copyright © 2009 Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Org. Inc.


Posted by Dean A. Ayers, Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom on 08/09/2009 at 01:30 PM in Books, Current Affairs, Dog Insurance Requirements, Dog Law, Dog Ordinance Tyranny, Dog Rescue Action Needed, Dogs, Pets, and Animals, Film, Food and Drink, Games, GlenwoodIowa.org, Health Care, Humane Health Care?, Music, My Dogs..., Pet Food, Private Property Intrusion, Religion, RFID Chips, Sarah Palin or Satire , Science, Socialist America, Sports, Television, Travel, Web/Tech, Weblogs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This | Save to del.icio.us

The Crisis of Choosing Between Owning a Dog and Obtaining Home Owners Insurance (Part 2 of 2 Articles)

Posted August 1, 2009




The Crisis of Choosing Between Owning a Dog and Obtaining Home Owners Insurance (Part 2 of 2 Articles)

The dogs aren't the bad guys. Animal law making people are.


26 July 09

By Dean A. Ayers

Lead Investigative Reporter

NationalDogPress ©


Dogs have never been more a part of our lives than they are today. Even though nearly 45 million American homes have at least one canine family member, dogs are being forced out of their homes by various dog ban legislation and by home owner’s insurance outrageous premiums as a result of legislation dog insurance mandates. These mandated dog insurance policies are being pushed by various animal rights activist groups, and law making people who ‘buy into’ the local media ‘hype’ when a dog bite incident occurs on private property or in the community. Additionally, these slanted propaganda media blitz’s about dangerous dogs and potential dangerous dog breeds are over-emphasized by the main stream media to ‘push’ dogs into being banned out of entire communities. In fact, this “potential dangerous dog” media hysteria is occurring nation wide in ever-increasing numbers, however this article's factual information contend that the headlines fail to tell the whole story about actual and realistic dog behavior.

For a real example of what ‘propaganda’ dangerous dog and dog bite ‘hype’ can do, you have to look no farther than in Denver, Colorado. Denver has one of the toughest pit bull bans in the country. Some 2,000 pit bulls were put to death there last year alone because of it. Denver, CO. has allegedly become known as the ‘dog hating’ capital of the nation.

Around the country, banning pit bulls has become the most popular answer to the potential ‘dangerous dog’ question. Many states and the municipalities alike, just like Omaha, Nebraska, and Mills County, Iowa, have now implemented major animal care and control legislation and these areas like the rest of the country have jumped on the animal rights dangerous dog 'ban' wagon. In Mills County, Iowa if your 'harmless' dog escapes off your property three times, the County will designate your dog as a “dangerous dog.” It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to realize this tyranny legislation is going to have a great economic hardship on the dog owner’s home owner insurance premium and even the dog, if the owner can no longer afford to keep the dog due to fees, fines, and potential confiscation and euthanasia of the dog. Additionally, a cursory review of the Mills County, Iowa animal care and control ordinance disclosed there is no lawful and constitutional ‘due process’ afforded in the legislation for proper hearings and testimony for the dog owner, before the county animal control authorities can ‘legally’ confiscate, seize or euthanize your dogs. Like Mills County, Iowa a vast majority of these ‘animal care and controlling’ dog ordinances and legislation ‘fail’ to implement any constitutional ‘due process’ what so ever in their animal control regulations. Instead these ordinances and legislation designate animal control authorities the ability to ‘make life altering judgments about your dogs, without fact or proven evidence’ to ‘label’ your dog as a ‘dangerous dog.’ Without any lawful and constitutional means of evidence or hearing to do so animal control can invoke search, seizure, confiscation, and euthanasia of your dog on private property without a criminal act having taken place.

Even in the Mills County, Iowa animal care and control ordinance their “Board of Supervisors’ controlling these communities and locals, are giving themselves a ‘dictatorial’ authority to direct dogs be ‘euthanized’ at their discretion of any facts, without any true lawful hearing for the dog owners, to present a defense and witnesses on their behalf. And this is not just in Mills County, Iowa, this is happening across the USA in all communities and counties nation wide. This is complete and total ‘tyranny’ of government in animal control, thus causing insurance companies to also implement tyranny in home owner insurance policies, making it almost impossible to ‘afford’ to keep your dog on your own property.

The identification of a potentially dangerous dog always begins with the biggest and saddest stereo-types of the popular man loving dogs like the Rottweilers. The Rottweiler dog breed is ranked second only to pit bulls for their involvement in fatal dog attacks, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Little wonder that they've been singled out for special rules and restrictive animal control regulations. But let's not forget German shepherds, which also are high on the fatal-bite list. Also add Doberman pinschers, Akitas, Chows, Belgian Malinois, Alaskan Malamutes, Siberian Huskies, Irish Wolfhounds, Great Danes and Shar Pei, just to name a few. All of which are becoming among the chosen dog breeds being banned or strictly regulated under various current Breed Specific Legislation (BSL), “Dangerous Dog” legislations, and ultimately by legislation ‘mandated’ dog bite insurance policies of $100,000 or greater per dog all the way to a million dollar mandated dog bite policy for one dog on private property.

Insurance premiums such as this being ‘mandated’ in animal legislation will destroy any possibility of a responsible dog owner to keep their dog, or they face becoming a ‘criminal’ for defending their dog on their own private property. These tyranny dog legislation and ordinances in all communities are insuring that any lawful attempt by you as good law abiding citizens to prevent access to your dogs on your private property can be overcome by animal control simply going to a magistrate and stating the owner refuses inspection access to their private property, in these tyranny animal ordinances. No evidence of a ‘crime’ need be presented to obtain a warrant to enter your private property anymore with this kind of tyranny in the legislation and ordinances. Good bye dog owners, if you resist, and goodbye to your dogs thru fees, fines, confiscations, seizures, and dog euthanasia without any legal and proper constitutional hearing to prevent these ‘assassinations’ by animal control authorities nation wide. And if you manage to even get your confiscated dog back, it will cost you dearly, in fees, fines, RFID mandatory chipping, spay/neuter before they can be returned, license fees, and boarding for the animal, or you will ‘not’ get your dogs back from animal control and their humane society shelters. Essentially this is a 'perverted' legal maneuver for the county or municipality to ‘steal’ your dogs away from you, and sell them for a profit (as a rescue) while billing you for the expenses of the entire affair. The insurance companies making these dog ‘ban’ lists or ‘blacklists” of dog breeds may not be the direct ‘villain’ in these tyranny legislations, but they sure are playing directly into the hands of the law makers that are ‘mandating’ these tyranny insurance policies on owners of the newly designated ‘banned’ or designated ‘potentially dangerous’ dog breeds, which also include any ‘look alike’ dogs as well.


There are currently 75 banned dog breeds across the U.S. that is banned by various hone owner insurance companies as follows:

1. AIREDALE TERRIER
2. AKBASH
3. AKITA
4. ALAPAHA BLUE BLOOD BULLDOG
5. ALASKAN MALAMUTE
6. ALSATIAN SHEPHERD
7. AMERICAN BULLDOG
8. AMERICAN HUSKY
9. AMERICAN PIT BULL TERRIER
10. AMERICAN STAFFORDSHIRE TERRIER
11. AMERICAN WOLFDOG
12. ANATOLIAN SHEPHERD
13. ARIKARA DOG
14. AUSTRALIAN CATTLE DOG
15. AUSTRALIAN SHEPHERD
16. BELGIAN MALINOIS
17. BELGIAN SHEEPDOG
18. BELGIAN TURVUREN
19. BLUE HEELER
20. BOERBUL
21. BORZOI
22. BOSTON TERRIER
23. BOUVIER DES FLANDRES
24. BOXER
25. BULLDOG
26. BULL TERRIER
27. BULL MASTIFF
28. CANE CORSO
29. CATAHOULA LEOPARD DOG
30. CAUCASIAN SHEPHERD
31. CHINESE SHAR PEI
32. CHOW-CHOW
33. COLORADO DOG
34. DOBERMAN PINSCHER
35. DOGO DE ARGENTINO
36. DOGUE DE BORDEAUX
37. ENGLISH MASTIFFS
38. ENGLISH SPRINGER SPANIEL
39. ESKIMO DOG
40. ESTRELA MOUNTAIN DOG
41. FILA BRASILIERO
42. FOX TERRIER
43. FRENCH BULLDOG
44. GERMAN SHEPHERD DOG
45. GOLDEN RETRIEVER
46. GREENLAND HUSKY
47. GREAT DANE
48. GREAT PYRANEES
49. ITALIAN MASTIFF
50. KANGAL DOG
51. KEESHOND
52. KOMONDOR
53. KOTEZEBUE HUSKY
54. KUVAZ
55. LABRADOR RETRIEVER
56. LEONBERGER
57. MASTIFF
58. NEOPOLITAN MASTIFF
59. NEWFOUNDLAND
60. OTTERHOUND
61. PRESA DE CANARIO
62. PRESA DE MALLORQUIN
63. PUG
64. ROTTWEILER
65. SAARLOOS WOLFHOND
66. SAINT BERNARD
67. SAMOYED
68. SCOTTISH DEERHOUND
69. SIBERIAN HUSKY
70. SPANISH MASTIFF
71. STAFFORDSHIRE BULL TERRIER
72. TIMBER SHEPHERD
73. TOSA INU
74. TUNDRA SHEPHERD
75. WOLF SPITZ

How's that for scary? Are you as a responsible owner, of one of these dog breeds wide awake now? How about just owning a dog that looks like one of these banned dog breeds?

The number of breeds already deemed dangerous should be enough to make any dog owner dizzy. But the proliferation of breed-specific legislation and dangerous dog legislation was initially sparked the various dangerous dog Summits around the country and also includes dog bans on any mixes thereof, as well as dog bans on many dogs of a certain size.

In Fairfield, Iowa for example, any dog over 100 pounds is subject to regulations. By definition alone, that would include such breeds as the borzoi, the Great Pyrenees, the Newfoundland and the St. Bernard. Some dogs that have caused serious injury have managed to escape the bans for now.

Last year, there were 26 human fatalities from dog bite injuries. It's unclear how many serious bite injuries dogs inflict each year, but estimates based on the last major study of cases treated in hospital emergency rooms puts the number at around 334,000.

Children under 10, the main victims of dog bites, are two times more likely to drown in a five-gallon bucket, and 1 1/2 times more likely to die from injuries caused by playground equipment, than they are to die from a dog attack.

Some figures from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration also may help put the dog-bite situation into perspective: Between 1997 and 2002 in Colorado, one child was killed by a dog. Between 1997 and 2002 in the United States, one child was killed in an alcohol-related motor-vehicle accident every day.

If we have a dangerous-dog problem in specific areas it is because twenty-five percent of dogs involved in fatal attacks are chained or otherwise confined excessively. Others are poorly trained or poorly handled guard dogs. Or used as a macho status symbol for young gang-bangers. Some dogs are victims of domestic violence.


Chained dogs are also 'not' the problem:

Many poorly thought out, inappropriate and misguided "tethering" laws are being proposed around the country. These restrictive 'tethering' laws would be in many breed types, inappropriate in a dog's proper care with any responsible dog owner. Many performance dogs ‘prefer’ to be outside and are best chained for their own protection. Experts in proper dog care performance have found that dogs that are permitted to roam freely are more apt to join up with other free roaming dogs and attack. Of course, there are those that are chained "just because" and not well cared for to begin with. Some call them 'junk-yard' dogs.


Breed bans are an emotional response to unfortunate incidents:

They're a response to dog attack fear, not to facts. All dogs bite, and all can potentially cause serious injuries. No scientific studies have proven that one breed bites more than any other.

Existing animal-control laws aren't properly enforced. If they were, many of the problems related to dangerous dogs, mistreated/mishandled junk-yard dog-chained dogs, or dogs running loose would be lessened. When animal control targets 'petty' animal rights issues for criminal action, they are taking away serious potential to stop actual dangerous dog situations, caused by the poor quality handling/training in the owners.


When breeds are banned or designated as ‘dangerous dog’ breeds:

The irresponsible dog owners will continue to ignore the laws, or turn to other breeds, re-creating the problem. Shelter systems and animal-control 'claim' they may not be able to handle all the surplus animals. Actually the facts are disclosing animal shelter/rescue destructive practices to sustain a 'pet-overpopulation' in order to seek more animal control funding and donations.

Studies have shown that animal-control officers cannot identify "pit bull terriers" beyond a reasonable doubt and have miss-identified dogs that did not look like a pit bull, even if it was 50 percent pit bull; yet the dog was not considered a pit bull. But if a dog 'looked' like a pit, it was considered a pit, no matter what the percentage of the breed.

One thing that always stands out about dogs is that dogs throughout history are documented and known to be entirely a ‘responsive’ species. This Investigative Reporter notes that "we can breed them and train them to be any way we want them to be”. All dogs just want, is just to please us. If we humans as their owners want our dogs to herd, they'll do it. If we want our dogs just to just cozy up with us on the sofa, they'll do that. So if we ask our dogs to become aggressive and violent, either intentionally or through irresponsibility, “they will respond that way."


The dogs aren't the bad guys. Animal law making people are.

The dogs are the victims, not just of irresponsible breeders and owners but of the violence that pervades of our whole society. No one in law considers the ‘Intrinsic value’ established by precedent setting lawful court cases that establish dogs as being more than just ‘chattel.’ No lawful ‘due process’ is included in the animal control legislation that meet a constitutional challenge. Rather these tyranny animal control laws are approved ‘knowing’ that virtually no one owning a dog, can sustain a lengthy and costly court battle to establish the ‘unconstitutional’ provisions within these tyranny animal care and control laws on the books, nation wide.

On one level the dangerous dog prevention measures need to be about restoring the family image of the bully breeds. Also about objecting to the breed-specific laws and potentially dangerous dog breed laws that threaten to deprive dog owners of their animals and about turning pet owners and breeders into responsible animal property owners.

But at a deeper level, it's about ending the cycle of violence by starting a campaign of kindness.

"Kindness" is to the owner's animals, as kindness is to each other by not 'over-reacting' to isolated dog attacks by installing and promoting 'bad' dangerous dog legislation. It's that simple.

But each of us as individuals and as a society will make the world a better place for all of us if we only give our dog's love, teach them kindness for each of us and each other, and give kindness to all animals, with a chance to thrive in preserving dog and pet ownership with freedom on private property with dog ownership responsibility. In this manner we can then avoid the crisis of choosing between owning a dog and still being able to obtain home owners insurance.


I Say: 'A man's religion of dog ownership is not worth its salt, if his/her dogs are not the better for it.'

© NationalDogPress News



Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit)

"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."


PLEASE DONATE to Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) BY CLICKING ON THE PAYPAL LINK:

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=6721925


Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Legal Disclaimer: The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.

Copyright © 2006-2009, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) Iowa 2009, NationalDogPress News, All Rights Reserved

An Old Farmer's Advice to Obama and Congress

Posted July 12, 2009



An Old Farmer's Advice to Obama and Congress


*Your fences need to be horse-high, pig-tight and bull-strong.

* Keep skunks and bankers and lawyers at a distance.

* Life is simpler when you plow around the stump.

* A bumble bee is considerably faster than a John Deere tractor.

* Words that soak into your ears are whispered...not yelled.

* Meanness don't jes' happen overnight.

* Forgive your enemies. It messes up their heads.

* Do not corner something that you know is meaner than you.

* It don't take a very big person to carry a grudge.

* You cannot unsay a cruel word.

* Every path has a few puddles.

* When you wallow with pigs, expect to get dirty.

* The best sermons are lived, not preached.

* Most of the stuff people worry about ain't never gonna happen anyway.

* Don't judge folks by their relatives.

* Remember that silence is sometimes the best answer.

* Live a good, honorable life. Then when you get older and think back, you'll enjoy it a second time.

* Don't interfere with somethin' that ain't botherin' you none.

* Timing has a lot to do with the outcome of a rain dance.

* If you find yourself in a hole, the first thing to do is stop diggin'.

* Sometimes you get, and sometimes you get got.

* The biggest troublemaker, you'll probably ever have to deal with, watches you from the mirror every mornin'.

* Always drink upstream from the herd.

* Good judgment comes from experience, and a lotta that comes from bad judgment.

* Lettin' the cat outta the bag is a whole lot easier than puttin' it back in.

* If you get to thinkin' you're a person of some influence, try orderin' somebody else's dog around.

* Live simply. Love generously. Care deeply. Speak kindly. And leave us "free" people alone.

* Never judge a book by it's cover, or a nation by it's "lip service" and it's Socialist Commi-Pinko tax laws. Because a penny saved from the clutches of the Obama Nation is a penny earned without Socialism.

Leave the rest to God.


Posted by Dean A. Ayers, Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom on 07/12/2009 at 12:08 PM in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This | Save to del.icio.us

An Old Farmer's Advice to Obama and Congress

Posted July 12, 2009


An Old Farmer's Advice to Obama and Congress


*Your fences need to be horse-high, pig-tight and bull-strong.

* Keep skunks and bankers and lawyers at a distance.

* Life is simpler when you plow around the stump.

* A bumble bee is considerably faster than a John Deere tractor.

* Words that soak into your ears are whispered...not yelled.

* Meanness don't jes' happen overnight.

* Forgive your enemies. It messes up their heads.

* Do not corner something that you know is meaner than you.

* It don't take a very big person to carry a grudge.

* You cannot unsay a cruel word.

* Every path has a few puddles.

* When you wallow with pigs, expect to get dirty.

* The best sermons are lived, not preached.

* Most of the stuff people worry about ain't never gonna happen anyway.

* Don't judge folks by their relatives.

* Remember that silence is sometimes the best answer.

* Live a good, honorable life. Then when you get older and think back, you'll enjoy it a second time.

* Don't interfere with somethin' that ain't botherin' you none.

* Timing has a lot to do with the outcome of a rain dance.

* If you find yourself in a hole, the first thing to do is stop diggin'.

* Sometimes you get, and sometimes you get got.

* The biggest troublemaker, you'll probably ever have to deal with, watches you from the mirror every mornin'.

* Always drink upstream from the herd.

* Good judgment comes from experience, and a lotta that comes from bad judgment.

* Lettin' the cat outta the bag is a whole lot easier than puttin' it back in.

* If you get to thinkin' you're a person of some influence, try orderin' somebody else's dog around.

* Live simply. Love generously. Care deeply. Speak kindly. And leave us "free" people alone.

* Never judge a book by it's cover, or a nation by it's "lip service" and it's Socialist Commi-Pinko tax laws. Because a penny saved from the clutches of the Obama Nation is a penny earned without Socialism.

Leave the rest to God.


Posted by Dean A. Ayers, Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom on 07/12/2009 at 12:08 PM in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This | Save to del.icio.us

Dog ordinance 'number limits' are not logical or valid

Posted July 7, 2009



Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom

Dog ordinance 'number limits' are not logical or valid

Dog 'number limit' ordinances lead to a decrease in pet license taxes collected from non-reporting owners over the pet limits. The 'number limit' laws are counterproductive.

MILLS COUNTY, Iowa, 7 July 09 (NationalDogPress.com) --

Dogs and dog owners face more discrimination than ever before in American society. While local, city, county, state, and federal entities pay lip service to the dog as man’s best friend by passing tyranny dog limiting ordinances and laws, We the People as a whole community allow fear and politics to determine the parameters of dog ownership based upon emotions not logic and common sense in law making.

We the People, spend hundreds of millions of dollars on premium foods, veterinary care, toys, kennels, pet sitters, training classes, and more even while limiting the number and type of dogs an owner can house. We use dogs to aid in catching criminals, search for victims of crimes and natural disasters, help handicapped humans, and provide emotional support even while barring dogs from communities if they exceed a certain weight, certain breed to be banned, or limits to the number of dogs allowed in a home even if they are properly cared for and loved as family.


The disadvantages of dog number limits in homes are:

Dog owners in some communities face a limit on the number of pets they can own, but these limits, too, are counterproductive.

Laws that criminalize pet ownership based on numbers alone have been declared unconstitutional in some states because they do not address the need to control nuisances or provide for the health and safety of residents.

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, the state’s highest court, has declared such a law unconstitutional in that state, citing a precedent in Kadash v City of Williamsport:

“What is not an infringement upon public safety and is not a nuisance cannot be made one by legislative fiat and then prohibited....

“Even legitimate legislative goals cannot be pursued by means which stifle fundamental personal liberty when the goals can otherwise be more reasonably achieved.”


A dog or pet limit ordinance is difficult to enforce without increased presence of animal control or police agencies and often leads to a decrease in pet licensing to prevent cross-referencing of license records. If the law is enforced only upon complaint, it becomes just another law for people to circumvent and further erodes confidence in legislative bodies.

Numbers have no relationship to nuisances. A person with one dog that runs loose or barks all night is a greater nuisance than a person with a dozen dogs that are quiet, clean, and kept at home.

Limiting people to four dogs (or fewer) puts an unreasonable strain on people who raise show dogs, compete in performance trials, participate in canine rescue operations, foster dogs for service dog organizations, etc. and can lead to those responsible dog owners leaving the community.

A number limit causes dog deaths by forcing people to give up dogs they own, thus causing crowding in local shelters; denying people the opportunity to buy an additional dog from a shelter or a rescue; and adversely impacting rescue groups and foster homes that help find new homes for dogs whose owners cannot keep them.


Alternatives to number limits are:

Passage and enforcement of strict nuisance laws.
Use of an arbitrator to mediate neighborhood disputes about animals.
Use of alternative sentencing such as community service at the county animal shelter or attendance at a full obedience training course for those who violate nuisance ordinances.
Periodic programs or mailings about responsible dog ownership or city sponsorship of a Canine Good Citizen test to encourage residents to be responsible dog owners.

Animal laws are not always a result of state and federal battles. Squabbles between neighbors often erupt over animals, squabbles that often spill over into law enforcement or animal control filed complaints to local governments.

As an emotional result the local government greases the squeaky wheel complaints by citizens with even more stricter ordinances or other tacked on to the zoning code or the criminal codes to existing animal ordinances.

Dog limit ordinances are often passed out of frustration, with little consideration for the consequences or valid and factual basis to make any “positive or constructive” benefit to the community dog complaints, other than a government official “feel good” action giving We the People even more tyranny in our local animal control ordinances.

Copyright © 2006-2009, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization, All Rights Reserved


Dean A. Ayers
Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization
"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."

Dean A. Ayers is a prior United States Air Force Special Agent for the AFOSI. His duties included that of law enforcement specialist, criminal, fraud, and counter-intelligence. He was assigned to felony crimes in federal government, fraud, waste and abuse investigations of the military branches of service, and counter-intelligence in overseas locations. Dean was also a former Texas State Commissioned Alamo State Park Armed Ranger.

Dean is currently Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization and Dean is also a Lead Investigative Reporter for the NationalDogPress.com Headline News ©, and DogPress.org news press services.

Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Legal Disclaimer: The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.

Copyright © 2006-2009, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization, All Rights Reserved

Posted by CODE: RED - Final Notice at 12:47 AM

Labels: Dog Law - Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom, Dog Licensing, Dog Limit Ordinances, Dogs, Iowa, Mills County, NationalDogPress.com

Choose Christ or the Dogma of the “Mark of the Beast?”

Posted July 5, 2009



Choose Christ or the Dogma of the “Mark of the Beast?”

When the time comes? - Or have we already?


by Dean A. Ayers
Lead Investigative Reporter
NationalDogPress.com Headline News ©

Author’s Note: This article is provided as "Food for Thought" regarding the Prophecy of the "Mark of the Beast" and not for it's religious "accuracy" according to any particular faith, or my personal beliefs. ~ Dean A. Ayers

”And I have been supported under trials and troubles of every kind, yea, and in all manner of afflictions; yea, God has delivered me from prison, and from bonds, and from death; yea, and I do put my trust in him, and he will still deliver me.”

Nearly every Christian is keenly aware that the Bible warns of a certain "mark of the beast" that must never be accepted. Yet few Christians are aware that they have already accepted government identification and licenses for themselves and even their own dogs in “RFID” identification “chipping” that are the slippery slope leading to the final "mark" of the beast.

Revelation 13:17 explains that in the end times people will not be able to "buy or sell" without "the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name." The name and number of the beast are already an accepted part of every citizen's daily business, and wholeheartedly accepted by mainstream Christianity.

The "name" of the beast is a person's name spelled in all capital letters. It is a distinct identity created by government (the beast). A state issues a driver's license to John Doe in all capital letters — JOHN DOE. The same is true of a credit card, a bank checking account and the Social Security card. The created "person" does not have the same God-given rights as the flesh and blood man or woman (you) when operating under their given Christian name.

The "number of the beast" is the government assigned number that is attached to the created "person." For example, Mr. JOHN DOE applies for a state driver's license, and government creates JOHN DOE, #123456789. JOHN DOE signs the license, and agrees to operate in the system of commerce as JOHN DOE, #123456789. In effect, he (or she) assumes the identity created for them by the beast.

Throughout the world today it is already extremely difficult to "buy or sell" without the created (all capitals name) and its assigned number as identification. A bank account, credit card, driver's license and Social Security all use the "name" and "number" of the beast. Accepting the beast's ungodly money system and surrendering your God-given rights instead for beast issued privileges is how you are lead to unwittingly "worship the image of the beast." While the subject of how you "worship" is hotly contested by those seeking to justify their position, Romans 6:15 puts it rather succinctly:

"Know ye not that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or obedience unto righteousness."

If you study this passage, you'll see that either option is "obedience," but one path is sinful and leads to death, and the other is associated with righteousness and leads to life. While a lengthy exposition of the much distorted 13th chapter of Romans is beyond the scope of this present article, the simple fact is this verse in Romans 6 states that one form of obedience leads to death.

The bad news is that the entire world is preparing to accept the final "mark of the beast" — the one that brings God's condemnation and eternal damnation (see Revelation 14:9). Worse yet, they will do it while quoting from the bar-coded NIV Bibles we carry, which are allegedly copyrighted in publishing by only one man, and it’s not Christ, mind you. Putting religion aside and speaking about reality, just what will our hope and change in reality be like?

A worldwide identification card with microprocessors and even under-the-skin microchips will enable a totally cashless — and Godless — beast society.

The United Nations is currently considering a plan proposed by Belgium's Pascal Smet for universal identification and registration of every person in the world. Mr. Smet points out that the European Union is considering a fingerprint or eye scan to identify every European. "There are no technical problems. It is only a question of will” by the government, according to Smet.

Since the beginning of this new beastly identification age began in the year 2002, more than 100 nations have some form of national ID system in place. In Spain an ID card is required at age 14; in Argentina at age 8; in Germany at age 16; in Belgium at age 15. Kenya requires national ID to be carried at all times by all citizens. In America, a Social Security number is required in order to receive a wage at almost any place of employment. In Texas if a law enforcement officer requests to see your identification and you fail to provide it you can be charged with a criminal offense of “failure to identify.” The very concept of working for a living implicitly embodies "buying and selling" — vis a vie exchanging your hours of effort in return for a financial remuneration.

A poll by the Pew Research Center showed that 2/3 of Americans support the mandatory display of a national ID card on demand in order to "feel safe and secure." So-called Smart-cards, an identity card with embedded chips are already in use by 120,000 U.S. military troops, and the goal is to issue 4 million cards within two years.

This technology has already been proven by Applied Digital Systems (ADS), the inventors of the so-called digital angel. ADS holds patents on “RFID” chips which are currently implanted in more than one million pets and animals to track and identify them. The embedded chips are already in voluntary use in many humans, such as heart patients with pacemakers or artificial valves, and even knee and hip replacement patients. An “RFID” chip implant is now required for all convicted sex-offenders in California.

Richard Sullivan, the CEO of ADS, says the chips will shortly be in widespread use in children, the elderly and employees at secure facilities. He believes society will quickly accept the “RFID” chip in place of ATM and credit cards. ADS are actively lobbying congress to force the implanting of an “RFID” chip in every foreigner admitted to the US in order to identify and track them. The company expects approval from the FDA within 18 months for unlimited use of their chips in humans.

Plans for the massive databases and infrastructure needed for "the mark of the beast" system are well under way. The American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators is working to link all state drivers’ license databases with high-tech licenses using biometric identifiers, bar codes and computer chips. Currently in America, state and federal police authorities use the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) database for identification purposes on vehicle stops. The US Department of Justice and the General Services Administration have admitted working on a standardized national ID system based upon the state driver's license. The Air Transport Association wants a travel card/ID system with biometric identifiers.

America's War on Terrorism is spreading throughout the world. Fourteen of the nineteen terrorists that attacked America on 9/11 had forged ID papers. Obviously, standard identification papers and cards are easily forged. The desire for safety and security makes the world population willing to submit to a unified system of identification for every person in the world.

The technology is already in place, so this is the obvious governmental beastly solution to the "problem" of identifying the undesirable elements among us. And the beast is ready to mandate it. A facial scan or hand scan are the quickest systems yet devised, and require the least digital storage.

What is truly startling is how few Christians have actually thought through the decision as to where they will draw the line. Most just vaguely say that they will refuse to accept any “RFID” chip implant while they take their dogs and cats to the Vet. the same day to have the animals implanted with the exact same “RFID” chips used for humans by the beast.

A few Christians have already publicly stated they will immediately accept any imbedded chip because Jesus "will forgive even that." These usually cite Scriptures speaking of submission to governing authorities and that God is all love and grace with no accountability by our own actions and decisions for us sinners who fail his teachings.

Others have recognized the spiritual nature of submission — and how the decision to abide or not to abide within the edicts of the beast is precedent to any final numbering scenario. These believe that their present refusal to function within existing political and commercial parameters is crucial to recognizing where the line will ultimately be drawn. These non-conformists are already resisting on a variety of levels, including renouncement of the Social Security number and a refusal to be licensed to drive or pay taxed licenses on pets. Not an easy thing to do in a society where driver's licenses are mandated to even get to a food store from home, or to even legally possess a dog or cat in your county without paying an animal “Tax License” or you risk being apprehended and your pet confiscated for being in violation of the county law (example: Mills County, Iowa Animal Care and Control Ordinance, passed 1 March 09).

Vast numbers of Christians confidently believe they will be raptured before the final requirement to receive a beast sanctioned identity is implemented. The simple truth is, the "mark of the beast" system has already ensnared significant numbers of "believers" who will simply continue to readjust their rationalizations as the beast slowly but surely tightens his grip on an already undiscerning Christian church. And still no rapture has saved them, nor ever will, from the beast.

"And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads;”

"And that no man might buy or sell, save he had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name." (Revelation 13:16, 17)

So my question to you all is? Subject: Mark of the Beast – Will you choose Christ or the Beast? – When the time comes? - Or have we already gone down that slippery slope of the beast by allowing our dogs, cats, pets, and animals to be “chipped?”

“I beseech of thee that thou wilt hear my words and learn of me; for I do know that whomsoever shall put their trust in God shall be supported in their trials, and their troubles, and their afflictions, and shall be lifted up at the last day.”

Give ear to my article and thoughts, good people. Learn the truth and educate yourselves not to be deceived, bit by bit, such as when you’re county, city, state or federal government entities mandate “RFID” chipping, and various other mandatory identification requirements, in order just to survive. Do not stand by and allow your freedom to be “chipped” away, even with your pets. It always begins with the animals, and then the government escalates the beast to us humans. It’s not yet too late, but it soon will be.

Remember what I spoke to you about in this article, and also take caution in the ramblings of “hope and change” we will all soon receive from a beast. Come to know the present and future visions and plans of our government entities for the conversion of all Americans both human and animal to a “Mark of the Beast.”

###

Dean A. Ayers is a prior United States Air Force Special Agent for the AFOSI. His duties included that of law enforcement specialist, criminal, fraud, and counter-intelligence. He was assigned to felony crimes in federal government, fraud, waste and abuse investigations of the military branches of service, and counter-intelligence in overseas locations. Dean was also a former Texas State Commissioned Alamo State Park Armed Ranger.

Dean is currently Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization and Dean is also a Lead Investigative Reporter for the NationalDogPress.com Headline News ©, and DogPress.org news press services.

Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Legal Disclaimer: The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.

Copyright © 2006-2009, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization, All Rights Reserved

Posted by CODE: RED - Final Notice

Labels: Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom | Dean Ayers | DogPress.org, Choose Christ or the Dogma of the “Mark of the Beast, NationalDogPress.com

How many zeros in a billion?

Posted July 4, 2009
How many zeros in a billion?

This is too true to be funny.

The next time you hear a politician use the Word 'billion' in a casual manner, think about
Whether you want the 'politicians' spending YOUR tax money.

A billion is a difficult number to comprehend, but putting that figure into some perspective in one of our releases.

A billion seconds ago it was 1959.

A billion minutes ago Jesus was alive.

A billion hours ago our ancestors were Living in the Stone Age.

A billion days ago no-one walked on the earth on two feet. called; 0 AD.

A billion dollars ago was only 8 hours and 20 minutes, at the rate our government is spending it.

A billion here and a billion there and it soon adds up.

While this thought is still fresh in our brain...
let's take a look at New Orleans .
It's amazing what you can learn with some simple division.

Louisiana Senator,
Mary Landrieu (D)
Is presently asking Congress for 250 BILLION DOLLARS
To rebuild New Orleans. Interesting number...
What does it mean?

Well... If you are one of the 484,674 residents of New Orleans (every man, woman, and child)
You each get $516,528.

Or... If you have one of the 188,251 homes in New Orleans , your home gets $1,329,787.

Or... If you are a family of four...Your family gets $2,066,012.

Washington, D. C < HELLO! >

Are all your calculators broken?

(Heck, yes - it can not count that high.)

Obama's Solution? - Read on...

Accounts Receivable Tax
Building Permit Tax
CDL License Tax
Cigarette Tax
Corporate Income Tax
Dog License Tax
Federal Income Tax
Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA)
Fishing License Tax
Food License Tax
Fuel Permit Tax
Gasoline Tax
Hunting License Tax
Inheritance Tax
Inventory Tax
IRS Interest Charges (tax on top of tax)
IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax)
Liquor Tax
Luxury Tax
Marriage License Tax
Medicare Tax
Property Tax
Real Estate Tax
Service charge taxes
Social Security Tax
Road Usage Tax (Truckers)
Sales Taxes
Recreational Vehicle Tax
School Tax
State Income Tax
State Unemployment Tax (SUTA)
Telephone Federal Excise Tax
Telephone Federal Universal Service Fee Tax
Telephone Federal, State and Local Surcharge Tax
Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax
Telephone Recurring and Non-recurring Charges Tax
Telephone State and Local Tax
Telephone Usage Charge Tax
Utility Tax
Vehicle License Registration Tax
Vehicle Sales Tax
Watercraft Registration Tax
Well Permit Tax
Workers Compensation Tax

STILL THINK THIS IS FUNNY?

Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago...
And our nation was the most prosperous in the world. No more...

We had absolutely no national debt..
We had the largest middle class in the world....
And Mom stayed home to raise the kids. Because Dad actually had a good paying job then.

What happened? Can you spell 'politicians!'

And I still have to Press '1' For English! WTF?

I hope this goes around the USA at least 100 BILLION times

What the heck happened?????

ANSWER: Socialism, Marxism, and Liberalism, creating an Obamanation.



Dean A. Ayers
Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization
"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."

Dean A. Ayers is a prior United States Air Force Special Agent for the AFOSI. His duties included that of law enforcement specialist, criminal, fraud, and counter-intelligence. He was assigned to felony crimes in federal government, fraud, waste and abuse investigations of the military branches of service, and counter-intelligence in overseas locations. Dean was also a former Texas State Commissioned Alamo State Park Armed Ranger.

Dean is currently Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization and Dean is also a Lead Investigative Reporter for the NationalDogPress.com Headline News ©, and DogPress.org news press services.

Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Legal Disclaimer: The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.

Copyright © 2006-2009, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization, All Rights Reserved

View older posts »

Read Over 50 Dog Law, Pet, Animal Welfare, and More, in Articles at the Links Below!

Welcome to Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated. (Nonprofit)

Welcome to our National Organization known as Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom.  We the People, of this National "Nonprofit" Organization, want to express our appreciation to you for taking an "active" interest in preserving "your" rights to freely own your "pets" and "animals" without intrusion by the government, individuals, or "animal rights activist" groups or organizations, whose sole mission are to "eliminate" and "destroy" our freedom, liberty, and American way of life, with our pets and animals on our own private property as extended members of our families.

Laws are only words written on paper, words that change on society's whim, and are interpreted  differently daily by politicians, lawyers, judges, and policemen. We cannot by total reliance on law, escape our "duty" to judge right and wrong, and take "action" to stop the tyranny at "Freedom's Gate." For a person's religion is not worth it's salt, if the animals and pets are not the better for it.

Dean A. Ayers, (Prior)  Special Agent, AFOSI, U.S.A.F., United States of America.


"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."


 

Please visit daily our National Organization's Official Web site for "daily' articles and postings. Feel free to leave your comments after the articles. Visit our posting web site at the following link:

 

http://www.AnimalsClubFreedom.typepad.com/

 

and

 

Associated Content (AC) Official Publisher of Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom Org.

 







Copyright © 2006-2010, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) Iowa 2009, All Rights Reserved

Dog Licensing Is An Outrage; Your Pet Belongs to You, Not the Government

Donate to Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Nonprofit)

Donate securely through our online donation page.

NationalDogPress News Spotlight

 

Dog Licensing Is An Outrage
Your Pet Belongs to You, Not the Government


by Dean A. Ayers

 
Email a link to this articleEmail a link to this article  Printer-friendly version of this articlePrinter-friendly version of this article  


The erosion of our freedom to own dogs, pets and animals, rings true of the current political climate in the USA Today. We the People who own dogs, cats, pets and animals are especially struck by the public’s statements concerning agreement or apathy towards all the various government licensing to include that of our pets and animals.


Definition of Licensing and the Misconceptions:

Most people seem to believe that a dog or pet license is a freedom, when in true fact, it is a taking. A license is a temporary, revocable permit issued by government that allows the holder to have something or to do something that is otherwise illegal. For example, in the USA the licensing of firearms has virtually removed our Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. Any time a license is issued, a freedom is jeopardized. By the very act of licensing dogs, the act of owning or even possessing a dog has been made illegal.


Animals are traditional property, now legally having “Intrinsic Value:”

Animals are human-kind's most ancient and traditional property. Before ever we settled down to a plot of land and threw seeds in the soil, we numbered animals as our most valuable possessions. Wealth has always been associated with the number of animals that a person owned, and kept. Now animal ownership, use, and the ancient, honorable practice of animal husbandry are under global attack by dog laws, animal ID laws globally. It was initiated by the animal "rights" movement, and adapted by local, state, and federal governments throughout the world.


A Dog's life has 'intrinsic value,' New York judge finds:

Finding that a dog "is somewhere between a person and personal property," a New York trial court said a pet owner whose dog died following unauthorized surgery may seek damages beyond the purchase price of the animal. "[A dog] is not an inanimate thing that just receives affection; it also returns it," the court wrote, citing Corso v. Crawford, 97 Misc. 2d 530 (N.Y., Queens County Civ. Ct. 1979).


Doing Away with Dog Ownership:

All the dog legislation, animal control laws, dog ownership licensing, animal breeder licensing and animal ID programs will effectively do away with all but the largest commercial breeders and providers. When the small traditional owner and holder have been the basis for our animals and economy world-wide, it soon will end with all animals owned being controlled through licensing of many types and behaviors, as well as the food we all eat for life will be controlled by the seed products being copyrighted thru large commercial concerns like Monsanto, and those of us who have traditionally grown our own food or owned animals personally for various reasons will be locked out or the owners will be locked up literally, also known as “Jail” or animal shelters, etc.


Read the rest of the article


Copyright © 2006 - 2010 Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Org. Inc.

 

Our 'Nonprofit' National Organization is for the protection of pet owner's and their dogs, cats, pets, and animals from tyranny intrusion by government, group, or individual entities.

 

Please pass this web site link on to your friends and family. On behalf of everyone here at Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom we'd like to thank you for your support.

 

Your friends at Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Nonprofit)